Find out how the Israeli Supreme Court's decision on military draft and the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on transgender rights are causing waves in the legal world!
The Israeli Supreme Court made a groundbreaking ruling, mandating the military draft of ultra-Orthodox men, potentially destabilizing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition. Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court has taken on cases challenging state laws on transgender healthcare, sparking debates on gender-affirming care rights. The legal landscapes in both countries are evolving, with significant implications for religious freedoms and LGBTQ+ rights.
In a surprising move, the Israeli Supreme Court also ordered the conscription of ultra-Orthodox men into the military due to the absence of a specific law. This decision may lead to a shift in the country's compulsory service system. On the other hand, the U.S. Supreme Court's consideration of transgender healthcare bans highlights the ongoing battle for transgender rights and access to medical treatments.
Israeli ultra-Orthodox lawmakers are now facing pressure to comply with the military draft ruling, potentially reshaping the country's political alliances. In the U.S., the Supreme Court's upcoming rulings on transgender rights could set a precedent for future legal battles on gender identity and healthcare access.
Israel's Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled unanimously that the military must begin drafting ultra-Orthodox men for military service, a decision that could ...
The court said that in the absence of a law that distinguishes between Jewish seminary students and other draftees, Israel's compulsory military service system ...
Israel's Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that ultra-Orthodox Jewish men must be drafted into the military, a new blow to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that ...
WASHINGTON (OSV News) -- The Supreme Court on June 24 agreed to hear a challenge to a Tennessee state law banning certain types of medical or surgical ...
The decision could result in ultra-Orthodox lawmakers pulling out of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's coalition and collapsing it.
Congress needs to legislate the basic requirements for “standing” to sue. If the plaintiff has no personal stake in the case, they've got no business asking ...
The case before the high court involves a law in Tennessee that restrict puberty blockers and hormone therapy for transgender minors. The federal appeals court ...
Israel's Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that the state must begin drafting ultra-Orthodox Jewish seminary students into the military, a decree which creates ...
You can watch the CNN Presidential Debate live on NewsNation on June 27. Join us for “Debate Night with Chris Cuomo” at 8p/7C for pre-debate analysis.
The United States Supreme Court will hear a case about the rights of transgender children to access gender-affirming health care.
Since the Supreme Court reversed constitutional abortion rights two years ago, the conservative majority has avoided referring to that Dobbs decision while ...
The court also is weighing in on disability bias, antitrust, the Feres doctrine, and religious covid-vaccine exemptions.
Israel's high court ruled unanimously that the military must begin drafting ultra-Orthodox men — a decision that could lead to the collapse of Prime ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has decided it will hear arguments and eventually make one of its first rulings on transgender rights for teenagers ...
USA, Washington DC, US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court agreed to consider the constitutionality of a Tennessee law banning gender affirming care for minors on ...
Israel's Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that the military must begin drafting ultra-Orthodox men for military service.
The court decision comes at a sensitive time, as the war in Gaza drags on into its ninth month and the number of dead soldiers continues to mount.
In a majority opinion issued Tuesday, six of the state's nine justices agreed with Attorney General Gentner Drummond that the contract creating St. Isidore of ...
In a closely watched case, Oklahoma's highest court blocked what was set to become the nation's first religious charter school. An appeal is likely.
A ruling next term on the environmental review for a Utah oil railway project could complicate White House permitting reforms.
"The State's establishment of a religious charter school violates Oklahoma statutes Oklahoma Constitution, and the Establishment Clause."
NEPA isn't a common law subject. What the statute says matters more than pre-2023 judicial opinions. The Supreme Court agreed yesterday to hear a case about ...
From a blockbuster Second Amendment decision to a more technical case about retaliatory arrests, sharp disagreements have emerged on the Supreme Court over ...
The Oklahoma State Supreme Court ruled that the virtual Catholic charter school St. Isidore violates state statutes, the state constitution, ...
Supreme Court rulings on hot-button issues, like presidential immunity and abortion access, could be handed down when justices meet this week to release ...
Gun control advocates in Maine and across the U.S. see the ruling as clarifying and restraining the dramatic expansion of gun rights in the court's ...
In a win for the separation of church and state, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that Oklahoma's approval of the nation's first religious public charter ...
The Supreme Court on June 24 agreed to hear a challenge to a Tennessee state law banning certain types of medical or surgical gender reassignment procedures ...
The Supreme Court clarified that, if the error coram nobis petition is not filed within one year after the conviction, the trial court may only consider it if ...
The state high court says the planned Catholic virtual charter school violates a state provision against aid to 'sectarian' institutions.
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has ruled that the approval of what would be the nation's first state-funded Catholic charter school is unconstitutional.
The court by a vote of 6-3 ruled that those challenging the government's interaction with social media companies lacked legal standing to sue.
According to Bloomberg News, a document posted briefly to the court's website suggested a majority of the justices would reinstate a lower-court ruling that ...
Court says publication on its website was "inadvertent" and that a final ruling has not been made.
The case, one of several this term on how the First Amendment applies to technology platforms, was dismissed on the ground that the plaintiffs lacked ...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the White House and federal agencies such as the FBI may continue to urge social media platforms to take down content ...
No, MAGA judges don't get to decide what the Biden administration is allowed to say.
The Supreme Court appears poised to allow abortions in medical emergencies in Idaho, according to a document that was erroneously posted on the court's ...
The Supreme Court "inadvertently" uploaded what it said was a "document' related to a ruling in a yet-to-be-released, high-profile case over Idaho's ban on ...
The Supreme Court on Wednesday tossed out a lawsuit that sought to curtail federal government outreach on social media content moderation.
The US Supreme Court is poised to allow abortions in medical emergencies in Idaho, according to a copy of an opinion that was briefly posted on the court's ...
The Supreme Court inadvertently posted an opinion on its website briefly Wednesday morning on Idaho and its abortion ban in emergency rooms.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday tossed out a lawsuit that sought to curtail federal government outreach on social media content moderation.
A document inadvertently uploaded to the U.S. Supreme Court's website appears to indicate the court will send a case regarding emergency abortion care in ...
U.S. Supreme Court decision is expected to reinstate protection for emergency medical providers from punishment under Idaho's strict abortion ban.
The document also includes a partial dissent from Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in which she cautions that the ruling was “not a victory for pregnant patients ...
Kavanaugh pointed to six reasons that, considered together, lead to the court's conclusion that Section 666 does not criminalize gratuities to state and local ...
The court, which has limited the sweep of several anti-corruption laws, distinguished after-the-fact rewards from before-the-fact bribes.