Breaking news: US Supreme Court overturns federal ban on bump stocks for guns. Find out the latest details!
In a momentous decision, the US Supreme Court has struck down the Trump-era federal ban on bump stocks, ruling that the government does not have the authority to prohibit the sale and possession of these gun accessories. The ruling, led by Justice Clarence Thomas, emphasized the distinction between a semi-automatic rifle with a bump stock and a 'machine gun,' stating that the devices do not convert firearms into automatic weapons. This decision marks a significant limitation on the government's power in regulating gun accessories.
The controversy surrounding bump stocks heightened following America's deadliest mass shooting, where the accessories were used. Despite the tragic event, the Supreme Court's ruling asserts that banning bump stocks is beyond the government's jurisdiction. This verdict has sparked debates on gun control and the interpretation of the Second Amendment, stirring discussions across the nation.
Senator Jacky Rosen, in response to the decision, expressed her concerns over the overturning of the ban, highlighting the implications for public safety and the need for comprehensive firearm regulations. The ruling, with a 6-3 majority, has divided opinions among lawmakers, activists, and the general public, fueling ongoing conversations about the balance between gun rights and public safety.
As the debate continues, the Supreme Court's decision on bump stocks sets a precedent for future gun control policies and legal battles. The impact of this ruling extends beyond the realm of firearms, influencing broader discussions on government overreach and individual rights, shaping the landscape of legal interpretations and legislative actions in the United States.
Writing for the court's conservative supermajority, Justice Clarence Thomas noted that a semi-automatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a "machine gun" ...
The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a federal ban on bump stocks approved by former President Donald Trump, the high court's latest stroke limiting the ...
It says the government does not have the right to ban the accessories, which were used in America's deadliest mass shooting.
The justices found that the administration had exceeded its power in prohibiting the sale and possession of the gun attachments.
In a ruling replete with diagrams of firing mechanisms, Justice Clarence Thomas said bump stock devices don't convert semi-automatic weapons into automatic ones ...
WASHINGTON, DC โ Today, U.S. Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) released the following statement after the Supreme Court overturned the Trump Administration's ...
The high court found 6-3 the Trump administration did not follow federal law when it reversed course and banned bump stocks after a gunman in Las Vegas ...
Michael Cargill, owner of Central Texas Gun Works, sued over the ban. The U.S. Supreme Court sided with him in a 6-3 decision Friday.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down a rule that banned bump stocks in the wake of a 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas.