The Supreme Court is in a heated battle over Donald Trump's immunity claims. Will he win the fight?
The Supreme Court is currently embroiled in a fiery debate over former President Donald Trump's claim of immunity from criminal charges related to his alleged interference in the 2020 election results. Trump argues that he cannot be prosecuted for his 'official acts' without first facing impeachment. The justices are set to decide the fate of his immunity plea, with implications not just for Trump but also for the future of presidential powers.
In a historic showdown, the Supreme Court is dissecting the breadth of Trump's immunity assertion, questioning its implications on the justice system. As the courtroom drama unfolds, key arguments from both sides are shaping the narrative. Will Trump emerge victorious in his bid for total immunity, setting a precedent that could echo through future presidencies?
Meanwhile, a separate trial in New York City adds another layer of complexity to Trump's legal battles. The hush money trial showcases a different facet of Trump's legal woes, highlighting the multi-front battle he faces post-presidency. As the cases unfold, the public eagerly awaits the Supreme Court's ruling, which could redefine the boundaries of presidential immunity.
As the Supreme Court weighs Trump's fate, the outcome of this high-stakes legal battle will have ripple effects on the power dynamics between the executive branch and the judiciary. Stay tuned as the final verdict on Trump's immunity claim draws near, potentially reshaping the landscape of presidential accountability and immunity.
Trump's argument for immunity is broad: He contends that he cannot be prosecuted for his "official acts" as president unless he is first impeached, ...
The Supreme Court considers Donald Trump's assertion of total immunity from criminal charges over his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results.
The justices already effectively gave Trump what he wants in his Supreme Court immunity case.
The justices will consider on Thursday whether the former president must face trial on charges that he tried to subvert the 2020 election.
The Supreme Court convened to consider whether former President Donald Trump is entitled to broad immunity from criminal charges in the 2020 election case.
There's more on the line on Thursday at the Supreme Court than in any other court date former President Trump has had — for him, for the office of the ...
A reluctant Donald Trump is back in a New York City courtroom as his hush money trial resumes in New York with testimony from a longtime tabloid publisher.
Long before the Supreme Court's messy involvement in the 2024 race (or the 2000 contest), Joseph P. Bradley was the decider in the contentious election of ...
Former President Donald Trump's attorneys claim he has immunity from criminal charges over his attempt to overturn the 2020 election results.
The Supreme Court heard nearly three hours of arguments Thursday in the blockbuster case over whether former President Donald Trump may claim immunity from ...
Arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court have ended after more than 2 1/2 hours in Donald Trump's bid to avoid prosecution over his efforts to overturn his ...
The Supreme Court seems highly skeptical of former President Donald Trump's claim of absolute immunity from prosecution.
More witness testimony in New York as top court decides if Trump can be prosecuted in separate federal election case.
The justices must consider whether Trump can be tried on criminal charges, and depending on the timing of their decision, whether a trial can move forward ...
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments about whether former President Donald Trump is immune from federal prosecution on criminal election interference ...
Former President Trump seems likely to win at least a partial victory from the Supreme Court in his effort to avoid prosecution for his role in Jan. 6.
"Without presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know it. For 234 years of American history, no president was ever ...
Both cases involved official misconduct. One alleged that Texas prosecutors illegally struck 13 women from Dillion Compton's jury because of their gender. The ...
It's unclear if the Court will explicitly hold that Trump could commit crimes with impunity, or if they'll just delay his trial so long that it doesn't ...
The Supreme Court appeared ready to reject former President Donald Trump's claims of sweeping immunity and the broad protections he has sought to shut down ...
The U.S. Supreme Court appeared skeptical Thursday of former President Donald Trump's argument he is immune from criminal charges.
Its answer will determine whether former President Donald Trump can be tried on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election. Whatever the decision, each ...
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court appeared skeptical Thursday of former President Donald Trump's argument he is immune from criminal charges that he tried ...
Representing Trump, John Sauer told the justices that without presidential immunity from criminal charges, the “presidency as we know it” will be changed. The “ ...
D. John Sauer conceded there are allegations in the indictment that do not involve official acts, meaning they would not be subject to any presidential ...
It is unclear after Thursday's arguments whether the court will act swiftly to resolve the appeal by former president Donald Trump.
Several justices signaled interest in some protections for official acts, which could impede a swift trial in the federal election subversion case.
Former President Donald Trump has long argued for absolute immunity in his federal election interference case, but on Thursday his lawyer struck a different ...