Gwyneth Paltrow verdict

The verdict came after more than a week of testimony that covered skiing etiquette, medical history and celebrity culture.

Mr. Ms. Moses, who was 9 at the time, said he had been skiing with an instructor when he “briefly” saw the collision and skied over to find his “mother and a person behind her” on the ground. Alina Fong, a concussion specialist, who said Mr. Sanderson testified that he heard a “bloodcurdling scream” just before a “serious, serious smack” sent him “absolutely flying.” His concussion, he said, had caused his personality to change and turned him into a “self-imposed recluse” who got confused and felt unsafe. The other skier, Terry Sanderson, 76, a retired optometrist, had sued Ms.

A Utah jury has found Gwyneth Paltrow not liable in a 2016 ski collision case. Terry Sanderson, a retired optometrist, sued Paltrow, an Oscar-winning actor ...

On Thursday, a jury found Paltrow not responsible after being sued by Terry Sanderson for a ski crash in 2016, referred to as a "hit and run." Paltrow was ...

“(Sanderson) wants the weighing of the scales the same way that Mrs. “From the day after this incident happened there was a very serious decline, (and) the people that knew him best testified…as to the changes that they experienced with Terry,” attorney C. Owens previously cautioned jurors not to let sympathy for Sanderson's injuries skew their judgments. His legal team also cited the turmoil the accident caused in his personal life. Paltrow was sued by Sanderson in 2019, who claimed she seriously injured him during a crash on the beginner slopes at Deer Valley Resort in Park City on Feb. Paltrow alleged Sanderson plowed into her and then told her he was fine. … It’s actually wrong that he hurt her, and he wants money from her.” He hurt her, and he wants $3 million for it,” Owens continued. Judge Kent Holmberg instructed the jurors to determine whether "Sanderson was harmed and if so, whether anyone is at fault for that harm. Fault means any wrongful act or failure to act," Holmberg continued, adding that fault, in this case, would be negligence based on whether they exercised reasonable care in the collision. The celebrity wellness influencer and "Shakespeare in Love" star previously vowed to donate any additional funds potentially awarded by the jury to a charitable organization. The trial began on March 21.

Terry Sanderson, a 76-year-old retired optometrist, sued Paltrow for $300,000, alleging that in 2016 the actor skied into him at the Deer Valley ski resort, ...

“And then there was a body pressing against me.” Terry Sanderson, a 76-year-old retired optometrist, sued Paltrow for $300,000, alleging that in 2016 the actor skied into him at the Deer Valley ski resort, leaving him with a concussion, four broken ribs and a brain injury. Paltrow was awarded the $1 requested in her countersuit.

The verdict is a blow for Sanderson, who filed the lawsuit against Paltrow seeking $300,000 in damages for the injuries he sustained after she allegedly plowed ...

During closing arguments he told jurors that Paltrow had decided to take a stand in fighting Sanderson's case. "You lose everybody — your family, they'll put up with you, and maybe the lawyers. "Part of Terry will forever be on the Bandara run," Sykes told the jury. "All I saw was a whole lot of snow. The verdict is a blow for Sanderson, who filed the lawsuit against Paltrow seeking $300,000 in damages for the injuries he sustained after she allegedly plowed into him. As a result, he said, he suffered four broken ribs and lifelong brain damage.

Hollywood actor and lifestyle guru found not liable for collision with optometrist Terry Sanderson in Park City in 2016.

He wrote on the day of the crash that Paltrow had crashed into his friend. The Hollywood A-lister Paltrow, 50, won concessions from the court to limit press and onlookers as she entered each day, often in a different outfit. Sanderson, 76, had initially brought a claim for $3m against Paltrow, but that was knocked down to $300,000 before the trial began. “I listened to how I was characterized … Separately, Sanderson said it was a “real disappointment” at how he had been characterized during the trial. In an emailed statement, Paltrow said: “I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity.

The actress, known for “Shakespeare in Love” and the “Iron Man” movies, had insisted the collision wasn't her fault.

[Sundance Film Festival,](https://apnews.com/hub/sundance-film-festival) where early in her career Paltrow would appear for the premieres of her movies including 1998’s “Sliding Doors,” at a time when she was known primarily as an actor, not a lifestyle influencer. Paltrow’s defense team represented Sanderson as an angry, aging and unsympathetic man who had over the years become “obsessed” with his lawsuit against Paltrow. Sanderson, 76, broke four ribs and sustained a concussion after the two tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow landing on top of him. The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on reputation rather than the monetary damages at stake in the case. In civil court in Utah, only three-fourths of jurors need to agree on a verdict. She sat intently through two weeks of testimony in what became the biggest celebrity court case

Gwyneth Paltrow was not at fault for the 2016 ski crash that a Utah man said she caused, a Park City jury found Thursday.

“Craig Ramon would be the definition of a bad witness,” Owens said. He ridiculed Christiansen’s testimony Thursday, calling it “unbelievable and inconsistent,” and said, “The flaky Deer Valley investigation, I think, was just a cover-up.” “He is not someone who falsifies reports.” Sanderson’s lawyers argued that he had been seriously injured; Paltrow’s lawyers downplayed the extent of those those injuries. But what does that tell her kids?” It’s the uphill skier that’s going to make that scream.” In another back-and-forth Thursday, Sykes pointed to a scream that Paltrow allegedly let out before the collision, which multiple said witnesses they heard, as proof that she was not hit from behind. “Don’t we all feel bad for him,” Owens told the jury. “I would have liked, by the way, at least a discount on the camel ride [during one of the trips] on the request for damages. “That is not fair.” “She will continue to stand for what she believes is right.” Holmberg] and the jury, and thank them for their thoughtfulness in handling this case.”

Actress Paltrow will receive $1 after winning her court case against retired optometrist Terry Sanderson.

"I'm going to be on the internet forever." "The attorneys for both sides are not coming off as well [as Paltrow]. [Sanderson's attorney Kristin VanOrman](https://www.newsweek.com/kristin-vanorman-questions-gwyneth-paltrow-trashed-lawyer-truly-bad-1790727), but people noted how chummy the pair seemed. Sanderson spoke to the media outside of the Park City courtroom where he called the verdict "very disappointing." He was seeking $300,000 in damages for the 2016 incident which occurred on the Deer Valley Resort in Park City, Utah. "I wish you well," were the words Paltrow said to Sanderson, according to him.

Having now ended in her victory, the star's trial over a ski crash has had the world rapt. It's all to do with her particular brand of unworldly celebrity, ...

["dangerous"](https://www.standard.co.uk/showbiz/gwyneth-paltrow-sparks-concern-podcast-diet-promotion-bone-broth-eating-disorder-b1067696.html). Her avatar of privileged white womanhood – inconceivably wealthy, hyper-fixated on things that most have never thought about (vaginal steamers, anyone?) – is a curious mixture of generational influence. These accessories all added to the drama, and as Twitter took serious delight in pointing out, she looked like nothing more or less than a woman on trial for ski-related crimes. And in today's relentlessly critical social media discourse, many find her schtick so over-the-top that they can't help but find it entertaining. There is something so absurd about Paltrow's image that it seems almost to transcend the disdain you might expect to be levelled at her for such flagrant unworldliness. Even her exceptionally trim body, at 50, is another part of the brand: recently, she has spoken about a bone-broth diet which has been widely criticised as What followed were eight frankly bizarre days of proceedings, featuring a phalanx of doctors, physicists (yes, really), and a defence attorney who repeatedly complimented Paltrow on her fashion sense and questioned her about her friendship with Taylor Swift. How to explain the sheer level of interest in the case? Before conscious uncoupling, her wellness brand Goop, or a child named Apple – never mind the public hoopla of a court case which naturally had to involve the most privileged of rich-person-accidents, a skiing collision – Gwyneth Paltrow was just a plain old movie star. [memes](https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2023/03/29/gwyneth-paltrows-skiing-trial-is-the-white-lotus-on-steroids/) of her testimony in the witness box that spread around the internet and platforms such as TikTok. And yesterday afternoon in the courtroom in Park City, Utah, (She subsequently [insisted ](https://www.insider.com/gwyneth-paltrow-defends-diet-after-facing-criticism-online-2023-3)that she has many days of eating "whatever" and "french fries".)

One of the jurors who served in the ski crash court case between Gwyneth Paltrow and Terry Sanderson speaks to ABC News exclusively.

This is based on the law," she said. I mean, this is based on the evidence. "I think there was, in the back of my mind, yes, this woman's an actress and I took that into account, but I didn't feel she had a reason to lie under oath," Imrie said. I think the fact that Dr. "He's a snow sports expert in many different ways. "I think it's important that the public doesn't just think that this was a win because Gwyneth's a celebrity.

"I think it's important that the public doesn't just think that this was a win because Gwyneth's a celebrity," juror Samantha Imrie said.

[after the verdict was delivered](https://www.newsweek.com/gwyneth-paltrow-whispered-one-sentence-accuser-after-court-victory-1791696), writing: "I felt that acquiescing to a false claim compromised my integrity. "I think it's important that the public doesn't just think that this was a win because Gwyneth's a celebrity," she said. Asked whether he thought the trial was worth it, he said: "Absolutely not. "I wouldn't have thought he was capable of those things based on the picture that had been painted." "I think the fact that Dr. But I do think that he did not intend to tell a truth that wasn't his truth."

A juror in the Gwyneth Paltrow ski accident trial speaks out for the first time on why the Oscar-winning actor won the case.

This is based on the evidence and this is based on the law. Sanderson was seen traveling the world and in seemingly good health. “I think I wrote down something like, ‘I need to make more money so I can travel this way,'” Imrie said. She’s always in the spotlight so she always has to be honest.” “He’s a snow sports expert in many different ways,” Imrie said. [Gwyneth Paltrow](https://variety.com/t/gwyneth-paltrow/) ski accident trial opened up to ABC News about the jury’s unanimous decision in favor of the Oscar-winning actor.

A day after the verdict for the Gwyneth Paltrow and Terry Sanderson trial was delivered, the internet is still talking about its viral moments.

And we’re most fascinated with celebrities in the points of collapse,” Luckett added. The entertainment centers “rich people who you want to hate,” but who ultimately viewers enjoy watching. [sided ](https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/gwyneth-paltrow-ski-crash-trial-summary-timeline-rcna77570)with the actress Thursday, finding that she was not at fault for a 2016 collision at a Utah ski resort, where Terry Sanderson, the original plaintiff in the case, said he sustained broken ribs and a concussion. Paltrow replied, “I would not say we’re good friends. We’re friendly. Paltrow countersued Sanderson seeking payment of $1.