Russian President Vladimir Putin has threatened to use hypersonic missiles against Ukraine. The Ukrainians are unimpressed, and we should not be surprised.
The other option is a truce and peace talks like the various negotiations that characterized the later years of the war in Vietnam. With the failure of technology and terror bombing, he only has Russian numbers as a potential advantage in a long war of attrition. He has played the trump card of a limited manpower call-up, and willing volunteers are generally confined to the dregs from prisons, no pun intended here. The bottom line here is that Moscow faces a true quagmire. If the leaders in Beijing contemplate a quick takeover of Taiwan, as Putin obviously planned in Ukraine, they should consider the consequences of the failure of such a coup-de-main -- a long-term conflict with Taiwan, supported by the U.S. Putin's problem is very similar to what the Americans faced in Vietnam. First, they realize that their distributed and decentralized method of fighting gives the Russians very few targets against which hypersonic weapons could pose a decisive threat. In essence, we are doing to Russia today what Russia and China did to us a half-century ago. Zelenskyy would become a martyr, and that would likely harden Ukrainian resolve. It took the French almost a century to figure out how to counter the English longbow, but the Confederate use of ironclad technology was countered near-immediately by the Union's USS Monitor during our Civil War. But so far, it has been the Ukrainians who have effectively used relatively mid-tech, anti-ship missiles in a land-based role. They have taken their measure of Russia and its military and found them wanting.
Vladimir Putin is an evil man. But in an American society that is rapidly losing shared moral standards, how do we know that? A moral judgment of the ...
Perhaps we will return to the ancient mode of living by epics and sagas: not just “Lord of the Rings” and “The Chronicles of Narnia,” but their pagan relatives like “Wheel of Time,” “Malazan Book of the Fallen” or “Percy Jackson and the Olympians.” The common moral DNA of a culture must come somewhere. They do what must be done, but the moral standards that determine the “must” are never explicit — much less argued or explained. Can we salvage a shared morality from the melange of messages that form contemporary culture: Twitter and TikTok; “Breaking Bad,” “Game of Thrones” and “Yellowstone”; the Marvel Universe and the “Star Wars” galaxies? [Leadership](https://amzn.to/3WQ06eA),” the elderly sage Henry Kissinger concludes with a deeply pessimistic assessment of the “age of image” in which we live. Wilson’s “The Moral Sense” demanded a response from high culture. If the collective pulpit has lost its reach, what will transmit a shared morality from which we can venture judgments about good and evil?
The then prime minister believed Russia's president was at heart a "patriot", archive files reveal.
"We don't really want to be associated with Clinton," he wrote to the prime minister. Mr Putin spoke warmly of the "closeness" between the UK and Russia. When it came to Nato, Mr Putin had told Mr Blair that he would not try to slow down the process of the bloc's enlargement. It will not however be as cosy as with the Clinton administration. They had also repeated unfounded rumours that a collision with a British submarine caused the disaster. Mr Putin had said he was grateful for the offers of British help.
Files show PM favoured allowing Putin 'a position on the top table' and encouraging him to integrate with west. Vladimir Putin and Tony Blair in Moscow in ...
Putin said he hoped to build a gas pipeline across Belarus that would supply the UK and “ensure stable supplies for decades to come”. “Despite the warmth of Putin’s rhetoric about the close links between Russia and the UK, the Russian intelligence effort against British targets remains at a high level. [Blair had courted controversy](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/mar/11/russia.ethicalforeignpolicy) with a hastily arranged and private visit designed to personalise ties with Putin. Key issues included Russia’s “concerning” supply to Iran’s weapons of mass destruction programme. Other papers released by the archives contain Blair’s private assessment of Putin. To describe him as a “Russian De Gaulle” would be misleading but he had a similar mindset, Blair added, and it was right to put pressure on him on a number of issues.
Sir Tony Blair believed Vladimir Putin was at heart a 'Russian patriot'. But UK officials feared Putin represented a return to Cold War attitudes and ...
He said in his November 1997 letter that while a place was set for Mr Smith, there was no chair. 'He [Sir Tony] understood that Putin had a low approval rating in the US. 'The Prime Minister described him as a Russian patriot, acutely aware that Russia had lost its respect in the world. Losing their seat is a worry for any politician. They included backing for the West's tough line on dealing with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and undertakings that Moscow would stop supplying Iran's nuclear programme. The then-Labour prime minister believed the former KGB man was at heart a 'Russian patriot' and it was important to encourage him to adopt Western values
Previously unseen British Government papers detail how Mr Blair described the former KGB man – who became Russian president in May 2000 – as a “Russian patriot” ...
A No10 private office official noted: “The prime minister asked early on if he could call the president-elect by his first name: Bush warmly assented (but stuck to addressing the prime minister as ‘sir’).” The documents suggest Mr Blair and his aides wasted no time in cementing the relationship with the incoming administration thereafter. A memo noted Russia needed to be informed that if it wanted to become a long-term energy supplier to Europe “capricious cuts in supply to their current customers are deeply unhelpful”. Mr Powell wrote: “You do not want to look like you are walking away from your former friend.” During a landmark joint summit between Nato and Russia in May 2002, held in Rome, host Silvio Berlusconi wrongfooted his fellow leaders when he suggested they delegate the Russia president to speak on their behalf during attempts that summer to defuse nuclear tensions at the time between India and Pakistan. Such was the intensity of the diplomacy that when the Labour leader found himself at the Kremlin for Putin’s birthday in October 2001 aides ensured he arrived with a pair of newly minted “No10 cufflinks”. A record of the meeting stated: “The Prime Minister described [Putin] as a Russian patriot, acutely aware that Russia had lost its respect in the world… The document claims “some successes” in London’s attempts to influence Putin’s thinking, but underlines the need for a “hard-headed approach to old-thinking and Soviet-style behaviour”. [Winston Churchill]to go on display in the new president’s Oval Office. But they also underline how Moscow was also keen in advancing its own agenda, namely with regard to energy security. During a meeting between Blair and Bush’s vice-president Dick Cheney, the then prime minister went out of his way to suggest the West needed to promote the “St Petersburg” – that is, European – aspects of Putin’s thinking. Some 22 years later, Putin would of course use spurious concerns about the same issue as part of the cover for his ruinous
Former prime minister believed Russian president was 'patriot' at heart.
“He [Mr Blair] understood that Putin had a low approval rating in the US. “The prime minister described him as a Russian patriot, acutely aware that Russia had lost its respect in the world. When Mr Blair travelled to Moscow in October 2001, a No 10 official informed him: “You will recall that Putin actually asked you to come to celebrate his birthday on Sunday so we are bringing a set of the new silver No 10 cufflinks as your gift – he will be the first leader to have them.”
Newly released files show the UK premier's efforts to woo the Russian president despite deep misgivings of officials.
For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the “Settings & Account” section. Compare Standard and Premium Digital For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital,
Tony Blair argued that Vladimir Putin should be given a seat at the international “top table” despite deep misgivings among officials about the new Tony ...
“He (Mr Blair) understood that Putin had a low approval rating in the US. [Mr Putin](https://www.cityam.com/russian-sausage-tycoon-dies-in-india-after-falling-out-of-window-police-investigate/) also told the prime minister he did not want to be considered to be “anti-Nato”, while his defence minister Marshal Igor Sergeyev then warned the alliance that any further enlargement would be “a major political error” requiring Moscow to take “appropriate steps”. To describe him as a Russian de Gaulle would be misleading, but he had a similar mindset,” the note of the meeting said. [Blair](https://www.cityam.com/more-than-half-a-million-brits-sign-petition-to-cancel-sir-tony-blairs-knighthood/) travelled to Moscow in October 2001, a No 10 official informed him: “You will recall that Putin actually asked you to come to celebrate his birthday on Sunday so we are bringing a set of the new silver No 10 cufflinks as your gift – he will be the first leader to have them.” [Labour](https://www.cityam.com/uk-shareholders-face-60-per-cent-wealth-grab-under-labour-warns-city-heavyweight-lord-lee/) has been asked for comment. [Blair](https://www.cityam.com/sir-tony-blair-there-is-no-plan-for-the-future-of-britain-as-boris-johnson-is-not-prepared-for-brexit-and-tech-revolution/), as prime minister, believed the former KGB man was at heart a “ [Russian patriot](https://www.cityam.com/red-faced-putin-russia-now-ready-to-negotiate-over-ukraine-war/)” and that it was important to encourage him to adopt western values. [On the sinking of the Russian submarine Kursk ](https://www.cityam.com/starmer-i-refuse-to-join-picket-lines-because-i-want-to-be-a-labour-pm/)with the loss of all 118 crew, the paper said that while Mr Putin had thanked [ Mr Blair for his offer of assistance](https://www.cityam.com/local-elections-2022-ex-tory-minister-nick-boles-boasts-on-twitter-it-is-the-first-time-ive-voted-labour-since-1997/), Russian officials had obstructed its delivery while spreading false rumours that it was the result of a collision with a British sub.
Former PM was keen to reach out to the Russian president and give him a seat at the top table, newly released archives show.
The note also read: “He [Sir Tony] understood that Putin had a low approval rating in the US. [would not welcome Nato enlargement](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1584027/Stay-away-Vladimir-Putin-tells-Nato.html) and that his opponents would try to exploit it. The Russian president responded by insisting that he wanted to “reinforce Russia’s relationship with Nato” and wanted its “voice to be heard”. During a lunch session at the summit, Mr Bush told Putin and other leaders that they “shared a common threat” and “must forge common tools to fight it”. [first Nato-Russia summit in Rome](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1395589/Nato-and-Russia-sign-historic-accord.html) in 2002 show how keen George W Bush, then the US president, was to [move on from Cold War-era concerns](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1584263/George-Bush-empty-handed-as-last-summit-with-Vladimir-Putin-ends-in-failure.html), such as nuclear disarmament, to focus on the War on Terror. [offer of assistance with the Kursk](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/0/kursk-really-happened-submarine-disaster/), Russian officials were spreading false rumours that it had collided with a British submarine. [Sir Tony and Putin](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1553900/Putin-in-meeting-snub-to-Blair.html), highlighted a long list of ways in which Moscow was failing to follow through on its promises. Sir Tony told Mr Cheney that he was “less critical than some” over Putin’s brutality in Chechnya and that “there was a danger of the West being naive” on the issue. The prime minister was not deterred, however, and another memo reveals that Sir Tony travelled to Moscow in Oct 2001 with a set of “silver No 10 cufflinks” as a birthday present for the Russian president. [reach for Western attitudes](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1434128/Blair-and-Putin-in-show-of-unity.html) as well as the Western economic model.” [Moscow could be engaged with](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/1375197/Blair-flies-out-for-bridge-building-visit-with-Putin.html) and convinced to work in favour of counter-terrorism and the liberal world order. In a summary of a Feb 2001 phone call between Sir Tony and Dick Cheney, then the US vice-president, the prime minister described Putin as a “Russian patriot” with a “similar mindset” to Charles de Gaulle.