Title 42

Two buses carrying a total of about 80 migrants arrived at Port Authority early Monday -- the first of 10 to 15 buses that were expected in New York City ...

If they’re found to face a credible threat, they can stay in the US until their case is decided, which could take years. “We need help from Washington.” [accused the federal government](https://nypost.com/2022/12/15/new-york-city-hall-worried-over-end-of-title-42-as-adams-requests-help/) of ignoring the city’s pleas for assistance — and blamed both Republicans and Democrats in Congress for failing to “lift a finger” to help. [Texas pol shares footage of jam-packed migrant center as end of Title 42 looms](https://nypost.com/2022/12/18/rep-tony-gonzales-calls-border-situation-dire-shares-footage-of-migrant-center/) [Lifting Title 42 will cause ‘total chaos’ on the border: Greg Abbott](https://nypost.com/2022/12/18/lifting-title-42-will-cause-total-chaos-on-the-border-texas-gov-greg-abbott-says/) [El Paso mayor declares state of emergency ahead of Title 42 lifting](https://nypost.com/2022/12/17/el-paso-mayor-oscar-leeser-declares-state-of-emergency-ahead-of-title-42-lifting/) [braced for the tidal wave](https://nypost.com/2022/12/18/mayor-eric-adams-office-warns-nyc-lawmakers-of-title-42-migrant-surge/) that’s expected to [accompany the lifting](https://nypost.com/2022/11/15/migrant-explosion-expected-after-judge-strikes-down-title-42-border-policy/) of pandemic-related restrictions at America’s southern border. [City Council members Sunday](https://nypost.com/2022/12/18/mayor-eric-adams-office-warns-nyc-lawmakers-of-title-42-migrant-surge/), Adams’ administration warned that 10 to 15 busloads of migrants were expected to arrive in the next two days due to the lifting of Title 42.

President Biden is trying to unwind a Trump-era policy that permits the rapid expulsion of migrants. Critics want the Supreme Court to stop him.

Circuit denied that request](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/12/16/appeals-court-clears-way-end-removal-migrants-under-title-42/10913783002/). [Republican officials want the Supreme Court to bloc](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/12/16/judge-ruled-title-42-should-end-but-bidens-doj-pushed-back/10891671002/)k the Biden administration from ending the Title 42 policy, which is set to expire at midnight Wednesday. If the court goes that route, it would have the effect of temporarily keeping the Title 42 policy in place while the case is decided but it doesn't necessarily indicate which way the high court is leaning. It is that decision the states are now appealing to the Supreme Court. [The emergency request from the states follows an order](https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/12/16/appeals-court-clears-way-end-removal-migrants-under-title-42/10913783002/)from a federal appeals court Friday against the states. The court has recently issued [Trump-era policy known as Title 42](https://www.cdc.gov/quarantine/pdf/CDC-Order-Prohibiting-Introduction-of-Persons_Final_3-20-20_3-p.pdf) that permits Customs and Border Protection to expel migrants without the usual legal review to Mexico or to their home countries to prevent the spread of COVID-19 in holding facilities. Court of Appeals for the While the Louisiana case over Biden's effort to wind down the policy was pending at the U.S. The move prompted lawsuits and, in May, a federal judge in The Title 42 authority has been used to expel migrants more than [2.4 million times since its implementation](https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/nationwide-encounters) in early 2020. The Biden administration has disputed that characterization and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Monday that the administration is "surging resources" to the border.

Border towns across the state of Texas are preparing for a surge of migrants as the controversial border policy Title 42 is set to end this week.

Border states and the federal government are bracing for a surge of migrant crossings when the pandemic-era policy is lifted.

[a federal judge found the policy unlawful](https://www.wsj.com/articles/judge-strikes-down-policy-used-to-keep-migrants-in-mexico-11668551190?mod=article_inline) because it denies applicants a chance to seek humanitarian protection. [10% Off Sitewide : Newegg promo code](https://www.wsj.com/coupons/newegg) WASHINGTON—Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily extended a Trump-era policy that bars asylum applicants from entering the U.S.

The Biden administration plans to lift the pandemic policy that's been in place since the Trump administration. It allowed the United States to quickly expel ...

The Democrat said he’s been assured that Gov. Over the weekend, El Paso’s mayor declared a state of emergency ahead of the end of Title 42. El Paso declares state of emergency ahead of Title 42 end

The imminent expiration of the immigration policy on Wednesday has prompted concern of a surge of arrivals at the southern border.

A group of Republican-led states on Friday [lost an effort in a federal appeals court](https://www.wsj.com/articles/court-denies-gop-states-request-to-extend-title-42-11671238831) to delay the end of the policy, and they could go to the Supreme Court next. Echoing other Democrats who say that political and economic crises in Central America are the true cause of surges in immigration, Rep. “We’ve been running on this being the border and Biden border crisis. But he said he’d also blame Senate Republicans if they voted in agreement with Democrats without demanding the Biden administration do more to secure the border — something that he asserted Democrats had no interest in doing. Instead, they say it’s being used improperly to expel people at the border, without hearings. “The need for Republicans in Congress to say what they won’t do has now been removed,” Bottoms said. A transit ban was previously championed by Stephen Miller, a Trump administration official who was highly conservative on immigration. [pushed for the end of Title 42](https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/20/judge-blocks-biden-administration-from-lifting-title-42-border-policy-00034195) and has made efforts to speed up processing for asylum seekers. Chip Roy, went further, accusing Democrats of “using the Hispanic community” as they processed migrants. government to restrict immigration during public health emergencies. Henry Cuellar, a Democrat who represents a border area in Texas, said on CBS’ “Face the Nation” of the Biden administration’s immigration plans for the end of the Title 42 policy. … It hasn’t worked.”

The Trump-era border management policy is expected to be repealed on Wednesday following a ruling from a federal judge. The policy had allowed officials to ...

The White House has increasingly been pressed on if Biden will visit the U.S.-Mexico border amid the migrant crisis. When asked about Manchin’s comments, Jean-Pierre said the White House intends to comply with the court order. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) said on Sunday that he believes Biden will ask for an extension of Title 42 after he joined a bipartisan letter asking Biden to extend the policy. they will adhere to the funding request.” will move to Title 8, which is the regular order that allows asylum applications. The policy had allowed officials to block migrants from seeking asylum claims in the U.S.

Republicans and some Democrats in Congress are calling on President Biden to extend Title 42 to prevent a further immigration crisis at the U.S.-Mexico ...

"We have a robust effort underway to manage the border in a safe, orderly and humane way when Title 42 lifts as required by court order. Instead of playing political games, Republican officials should provide the funding the president requested for border security and management, and pass the comprehensive immigration reform measures he proposed so we can finally have a modernized immigration system that works." [The Biden administration](https://www.foxnews.com/category/person/joe-biden) plans to lift Title 42 on Wednesday, ending a border policy enacted under former President Donald Trump that allows for the deportation of the vast majority of migrants amid the COVID-19 pandemic. 20, leaving Biden only a brief window of time to extend the policy. Immigration reform will not happen in our country until we all come on both sides of the aisle." border authorities](https://www.foxnews.com/category/us/immigration/border-security) are not prepared for the surge in migration that will surely come if President Biden's administration moves forward with ending Title 42.

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Monday put a temporary hold on the termination of a controversial Trump-era immigration policy known as Title 42 ...

In the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a public health order that officials said aimed to stop the spread of Covid-19. In court papers, their lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union argue that Covid-19 was always a thinly veiled pretense to increase immigration control. “While this stage of the litigation proceeds, we will continue our preparations to manage the border in a safe, orderly, and humane way when the Title 42 public health order lifts.” That order triggered the emergency application at the high court, which was addressed to Roberts, who oversees the DC-based appellate appeals court that ruled in the case. Already, federal officials and border communities have been bracing for an expected increase in migrant arrivals as early as this week, as the issue of immigration continues to ignite both sides of the political divide. The brief order from Roberts means the policy that allows officials to swiftly expel migrants at the US border will stay in effect at least until the justices decide the emergency application.

The chief justice temporarily stayed a lower court's ruling that required the Biden administration to lift the border policy by Wednesday.

The Justice Department and immigrant rights groups later agreed to delay the end of Title 42 for five weeks to allow implementation of new standards. DHS is weighing a revival of a “transit ban” model, ramping up new training for asylum officers to help them understand who qualifies under the higher standards of the international Convention Against Torture, District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan declared the government’s use of Title 42 to expel migrants to be illegal and required its immediate end. DHS is weighing a revival of a “transit ban” model, ramping up new training for asylum officers to help them understand who qualifies under the international Convention Against Torture and considering an expansion of humanitarian parole programs for Haitians, Nicaraguans and Cubans. The Department of Homeland Security is “surging resources to the border,” and the administration has “additional, robust planning” underway to wind down the policy, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said Monday. Already, thousands of migrants appeared to have gathered along the U.S.-Mexico border, knowing border officials will not be able to remove them as quickly as they could since Title 42 was reinstated in March 2020. The funding also would increase support for border cities like El Paso. Prior to Roberts’ action, the White House went on defense Monday, projecting readiness as both Democrats and Republicans warned the U.S. Roberts asked the Department of Justice to file a response with the high court by Tuesday evening. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday rejected the states’ bid to suspend the policy’s expected termination. The group’s request for relief from the high court comes after a three-judge panel on the D.C. Critics from both sides of the aisle have expressed doubt about the administration’s preparation.

A group of 19 Republican-led states on Monday asked the Supreme Court to stop the immigration restriction Title 42 from ending this week.

"Anyone who suggests otherwise is doing the work of smugglers spreading misinformation to make a quick buck off of vulnerable migrants." "What I can tell you is we are required by a court order to lift Title 42. The justices could agree to hear the appeal by granting a writ of certiorari. "Getting rid of Title 42 will recklessly and needlessly endanger more Americans and migrants by exacerbating the catastrophe that is occurring at our southern border," Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said in a statement. Border Patrol made a record 2.2 million apprehensions along the southern border this past fiscal year. Roberts' brief order did not discuss the merits of the case.

Nineteen states came to the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices to keep in place a Trump-era policy that allows immigration officials to quickly ...

But the court sent that case back to the lower court for it to determine whether the Biden administration complied with procedural requirements in unwinding the policy. [ruled](https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/biden-v-texas-2/) that the Biden administration had the discretion to end one of the Trump administration’s signature programs: the “remain in Mexico” policy, which sent people seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border back to Mexico to wait for a hearing in U.S. The administrative stay means that the policy will not automatically terminate on Wednesday if the justices need more time to rule. More broadly, the states accused the Biden administration of using “collusive, underhanded litigation tactics” to achieve its goal of revoking the policy without complying with federal procedural laws. It began as a challenge to the policy in federal court in Washington, D.C., by six families who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border without authorization and now seek asylum – on their own behalf but also as a class action on behalf of other families in the same position. But shortly before the policy was set to end in May, a federal judge in Louisiana ordered the Biden administration to continue the restrictions. If Sullivan’s order is allowed to stand, they argued, it “will hamstring emergency action by CDC to prevent aliens with communicable diseases from entering the United States in the future.” [rejected the states’ request to join the case on appeal](https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/orders.nsf/61A6C064C56833978525891B00045933/%24file/22-5325LDSN2.pdf). Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Nineteen states came to the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices to keep in place a Trump-era policy that allows immigration officials to quickly expel migrants seeking asylum at the U.S. District Judge Robert Summerhays concluded that the Biden administration had not provided proper notice of its decision to end the policy and an opportunity for the public to comment, as required by the federal law governing administrative agencies. In March 2020, citing the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trump administration relied on Title 42 to suspend the entry of migrants at the Mexico and Canada borders.

Title 42 allows border patrol officers to turn away migrants, including asylum seekers, at border under CDC's public health authorities ...

Sullivan writing the policy was “arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said during a press briefing Monday afternoon before the announcement that the U.S. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics. The Biden administration has until 5p.m. WASHINGTON — The U.S. The Guardian or Authority of Law, created by sculptor James Earle Fraser, rests on the side of the U.S.

Pandemic border restrictions known as Title 42 will continue, at least for now, after the Supreme Court granted a stay to Republican state attorneys general ...

Still, the administration kept Title 42 in place for over a year, and defended it in court as necessary to prevent the spread of COVID-19. But the judge stayed his own ruling to allow the Biden administration time to prepare. "As required by the Supreme Court's administrative stay order, the Title 42 public health order will remain in effect at this time and individuals who attempt to enter the United States unlawfully will continue to be expelled to Mexico." The Biden administration has reportedly been considering It's a victory for those Republican attorneys general who argued that lifting the restrictions would likely cause a surge of illegal immigration at the southern border. In a press conference Monday night, El Paso Mayor Oscar Leeser says shelters in Juarez, Mexcio are full and believes that 20,000 migrants there are waiting to cross into El Paso.