Armageddon

2022 - 10 - 7

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Politico"

POLITICO Playbook: Biden warns of nuclear 'Armageddon' (Politico)

President Joe Biden speaks. Last night at a fundraiser in New York City, President Joe Biden issued a stark warning about the risks of nuclear war in Ukraine. | ...

[“Top ally in Trump’s 2020 election plot fights professional sanctions,”](https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/06/top-ally-in-trumps-2020-election-plot-fights-professional-sanctions-00060757) by Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein: “JEFFREY CLARK appeared for a lengthy proceeding Thursday that is a prelude to a disciplinary hearing on claims he violated legal ethics in his persistent efforts to undercut the legitimacy of the 2020 election. One of the people familiar with Sasse’s plans said Ricketts himself is viewed as a potential appointee for the seat.” [Read the University of Florida news release](https://presidentsearch.ufl.edu/announcements-updates/) [Burgess Everett and Marianne LeVine report](https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/06/sasse-expected-to-resign-from-senate-00060812). [WaPo](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/06/biden-marijuana-decriminalization/): “The move by the president continues the push to roll back some of the most far-reaching impacts of the war on drugs that began about a half-century ago, just as Biden was entering the U.S. [WaPo’s Devlin Barrett and Perry Stein](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-tax-gun-charges/) report that federal agents who have been investigating HUNTER BIDEN “have gathered what they believe is sufficient evidence to charge him with tax crimes and a false statement related to a gun purchase.” Now, it will be up to the U.S. [A new excerpt of Rachael and Karoun Demirjian’s book](https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/10/07/trump-impeachment-trial-jamie-raskin-00060286) “Unchecked: The Untold Story Behind Congress’s Botched Impeachments of Donald Trump” [($28](https://www.harpercollins.com/products/unchecked-rachael-badekaroun-demirjian)) is up at POLITICO Magazine. [MICHAEL SCHAFFER ON MICHAEL FANONE’S NEW BOOK](https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/10/07/michael-fanone-jan-6-riot-cop-00060556) —There are tapes: “The average score-settling memoir is apt to devolve into a he-said/she-said news cycle. [POLITICO](https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/06/biden-to-pardon-marijuana-offenses-call-for-review-of-federal-law-00060796): “Democratic Pennsylvania Senate candidate JOHN FETTERMAN got advance notice from the White House that Biden was going to pardon marijuana offenses and review how it’s scheduled, a person familiar with the conversation said. [“GOP crisis in Herschel Walker race was nearly two years in the making,”](https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/06/herschel-walker-senate-abortion/) by WaPo’s Isaac Arnsdorf, Ashley Parker, Michael Scherer and Josh Dawsey: “For now, Republicans are publicly rallying around [HERSCHEL] WALKER as his campaign said online donations have skyrocketed. The move, you’ll recall, followed a [bombshell CNN story](https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/12/politics/trump-mccarthy-shouting-match-details/index.html) on KEVIN McCARTHY’s now-infamous Jan. [NYT](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/06/us/politics/biden-marijuana-pardon.html): “The pardons will clear everyone convicted on federal charges of simple possession since it became a crime in the 1970s.” … Stay tuned, sources (and future sources).”

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Associated Press"

Biden: Nuclear 'Armageddon' risk highest since '62 crisis (Associated Press)

NEW YORK (AP) — President Joe Biden said Thursday that the risk of nuclear “Armageddon” is at the highest level since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, ...

The White House had been avoiding applying the “war criminal” label to Putin, because it requires investigation and an international determination. Last month, Biden, in a CBS “60 Minutes” interview, said that “U.S. There’s some concern in the administration that Russia has determined it can use its nuclear arsenal in a manner short of a “full-blown” nuclear attack on Ukraine and face only limited reaction from U.S. The White House said after the interview that U.S. and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said. We are going to keep cool heads and we will, each time, denounce the irresponsible character of these threats.” “We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis,” he added. “I have always refused to engage in political fiction, and especially ... when speaking of nuclear weapons,” Macron said at a EU summit in Prague. She told reporters: “Russia’s talk of using nuclear weapons is irresponsible and there’s no way to use them without unintended consequences. The president’s grim assessment, delivered during a Democratic fundraiser on Thursday night, rippled around the globe and appeared to edge beyond the boundaries of current U.S. [strategic setbacks on the battlefield](/article/united-nations-general-assembly-russia-ukraine-kyiv-business-d1355f7c528a10c872e2a26b9d532e16).

Post cover
Image courtesy of "NBC News"

Biden warns of nuclear 'Armageddon' as Putin's military struggles (NBC News)

President Joe Biden said the risk of nuclear "Armageddon" is the highest it's been in roughly 60 years after renewed threats by Russian President Vladimir ...

This is still known popularly as "the red telephone," although “I don’t think it means he is any more likely to do it than he was yesterday.” His somewhat unguarded comments were not said on camera but reported by journalists as part of the pool reporting system. “I think it signals that he wants people to think he would risk nuclear war,” Phillips O’Brien, a professor of strategic studies at the University of St. Where does he find himself where he does not only lose face but significant power?" With pressure growing over those defeats and the chaotic mobilization at home, fears have intensified that he may be willing to escalate further rather than accept defeat. "We’ve got a guy I know fairly well. Where does he find a way out? [ call-up of 300,000 Russian troops](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putin-announces-partial-mobilization-russian-military-ukraine-war-rcna48585) after his military forces [ suffered severe setbacks](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/ukraine-surprise-counteroffensive-kharkiv-russia-land-east-rcna46805) on the battlefield in Ukraine. [renewed his threats](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/nuclear-threat-putin-ukraine-war-bluffing-rcna48713) as his [military retreats in Ukraine](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putin-military-retreat-ukraine-kremlin-criticism-shoigu-russia-rcna51168). [said](https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/nuclear-threat-putin-ukraine-war-bluffing-rcna48713) in a televised national address. [Russia invaded Ukraine](https://www.nbcnews.com/world/russia-ukraine-news) in February.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "CNN"

Biden's chilling 'Armageddon' warning sharpens the stakes with Putin (CNN)

To learn that an American president is talking so frankly about the possibility of nuclear "Armageddon," as Joe Biden did Thursday, is bone chilling.

All of his previous tactical assumptions and decisions in Ukraine have backfired and don’t show the kind of strategic caution and clear thinking that is critical when the question becomes whether or not to use nuclear weapons. “The fact is that President Putin and Russia have shown absolutely no interest in any kind of meaningful diplomacy. And if and when Russia shows that it has any seriousness of purpose, about engaging in such diplomacy, we’ll be ready, we’ll be there. Biden has been scrupulous in trying to avoid a direct confrontation with Russia over Ukraine even though Putin has styled the conflict as a showdown with the West. Ukraine is in no mood to talk after suffering an unprovoked invasion that has caused human carnage, especially as it now appears to have Russian troops on the run. Biden’s comments on Thursday underscore the burden that he now shoulders since the first president since the end of the Cold War more than 30 years ago who faces the frightening reality that nuclear war with Moscow is possible. In other words, Biden may be reasserting a measure of deterrence after Putin warned that he was not bluffing over his threat to possibly use a nuclear bomb. The White House says it has warned the Kremlin that such a decision would be “catastrophic” for Russia but has not said publicly exactly how they would respond – though there is speculation NATO might get involved and directly target Russian forces, a scenario that could lead to a dangerous escalation with Moscow. Biden’s remarks, at a fundraising event in New York, could open him to criticism by political opponents that he is speaking in an inartful way about nuclear war – and at a political fundraiser of all places. There has also been no shift in the US nuclear posture, the official said. But Biden’s musings do appear to offer a window into his thinking as he games out how this crisis ends. Presidents are often less guarded during political fundraising events, which are usually not on camera even though a press pool is allowed in for some remarks.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Bloomberg"

For Europe, Biden's 'Armageddon' Warning Can't Be Dismissed (Bloomberg)

European leaders said Friday that US President Joe Biden's warning about “Armageddon” and Russia's possible use of nuclear weapons shows the seriousness of ...

“And nobody can win a nuclear war. And I understand those messages have been given to Putin and the Kremlin that you can’t win this war.” “If nuclear weapons are used, then this is a whole new level,” she said.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Politico"

Pentagon: No sign Putin is planning to use nukes after Biden's ... (Politico)

The Pentagon said Friday that it still has seen no indications that Vladimir Putin is planning to launch nuclear weapons after President Joe Biden warned of ...

But if Putin chooses to go down that route, the West may not have much advance notice, officials warned. “I don’t think there’s any such thing as the ability to easily [use] a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon.” Where does he find himself in a position that he does not only lose face but lose significant power within Russia?” Patrick Ryder told reporters that the department does not have any information that would cause it to change its nuclear posture. officials told POLITICO that nothing has changed on the nuclear front in the past 24 hours. is taking Putin’s threats to use nuclear weapons, Defense Department spokesperson J.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "TMZ"

President Biden Warns of Nuclear 'Armageddon' at Democratic ... (TMZ)

President Biden put the nation on red alert Thursday, announcing nuclear "Armageddon" is a real possibility given Russia's recent setbacks in its 8-month ...

"Where does he find himself in a position that he does not not only lose face but lose significant power within Russia?" Biden went on to say, "We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis." Where does he find a way out?"

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The Washington Post"

Biden's scary invocation of nuclear 'Armageddon' (The Washington Post)

Speaking at a Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee event, Biden said that, for the "first time since the Cuban missile crisis, we have a direct threat of ...

He communicated directly with high-ranking Soviet officials, including [leading a delegation in 1979 for talks about the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty, or SALT](https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1979/08/31/kosygin-renews-pledge-on-bomber/092b33f4-e352-445d-a7d9-94edf572314c/?itid=lk_inline_manual_40). Senate in the mid-1970s, and one of his biggest priorities early in his tenure [nuclear briefcase](https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/1/25/18196416/nuclear-war-boris-yeltsin-1995-norway-rocket) was brought to him over fears of an inbound ballistic missile from Norway that Russia believed might be a strike from the Americans. The A-word is back in Biden’s public rhetoric — for the first time, at least in this foreign affairs context, since that Thanksgiving 2020 speech. And the threats to use nuclear weapons are very much out in the open. [on a level not seen in many years, if ever](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/09/26/putin-nuclear-threat-bluff-us-biden-response/?itid=lk_inline_manual_10), with Russia [threatening to use tactical nuclear weapons](https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/10/05/russia-nuclear-weapons-military-arsenal/?itid=lk_inline_manual_10). He was elected to the U.S. Then, there was a real danger of escalation to a global thermonuclear war that could bring humanity within minutes to Armageddon dimension. has never voiced anything like the current level of concern that a nuclear weapon might be used.” In 1983, the Soviet Union readied nuclear-equipped planes in East Germany during a NATO exercise. “There is no example since 1962 that comes even close to the concrete threats that Putin has been making,” said Paul D’Anieri, an expert at the University of California at Riverside on the relationship between Russia and Ukraine. In 1967, the U.S.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Axios"

White House: Biden's "Armageddon" warning not based on any new ... (Axios)

President Biden warned that the United States faces the highest chance of "Armageddon." since the Cuba missile crisis.

[Biden](https://www.axios.com/2022/10/07/biden-putin-russia-ukraine-armageddon) said at a fundraiser Thursday night that Putin "is not joking when he talks about potential use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological or chemical weapons because his military is, you might say, significantly underperforming," faces the highest chance of "Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" after Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a [veiled nuclear threat](https://www.axios.com/2022/09/21/putin-announces-partial-military-mobilization-for-russian-citizens) last month. [Biden: Putin could escalate "prospect of Armageddon" with nuclear weapons](https://www.axios.com/2022/10/07/biden-putin-russia-ukraine-armageddon) - "We have not seen any reason to adjust our own strategic nuclear posture," she added. [Biden: Putin could escalate "prospect of Armageddon" with nuclear weapons](/2022/10/07/biden-putin-russia-ukraine-armageddon) [Biden](https://www.axios.com/2022/10/07/biden-putin-russia-ukraine-armageddon) warned Thursday that the U.S.

Biden's 'Armageddon' Talk Edges Beyond Bounds of US Intel (U.S. News & World Report)

NEW YORK (AP) — President Joe Biden said Thursday that the risk of nuclear “Armageddon” is at the highest level since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, ...

The White House had been avoiding applying the “war criminal” label to Putin, because it requires investigation and an international determination. There’s some concern in the administration that Russia has determined it can use its nuclear arsenal in a manner short of a “full-blown” nuclear attack on Ukraine and face only limited reaction from U.S. The White House said after the interview that U.S. and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said. We are going to keep cool heads and we will, each time, denounce the irresponsible character of these threats.” men and women, would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. “But overseas countries are saying, ‘Whoa, this is what the U.S. “We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis,” he added. “I have always refused to engage in political fiction, and especially ... when speaking of nuclear weapons,” Macron said at a EU summit in Prague. She told reporters: “Russia’s talk of using nuclear weapons is irresponsible and there’s no way to use them without unintended consequences. The president’s grim assessment, delivered during a Democratic fundraiser on Thursday night, rippled around the globe and appeared to edge beyond the boundaries of current U.S.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The Guardian"

Biden's 'Armageddon' warning wasn't based on new intelligence, US ... (The Guardian)

US president made most outspoken remark on threat of wartime nuclear weapons when speaking at a fundraiser on Thursday. Joe Biden speaks in Hagerstown, ...

“I’m not someone who thinks escalation within a nuclear war is inevitable, but neither am I terribly sanguine about the prospects for managing it,” Acton said. “The president was speaking about concerns about Putin’s threats to use nuclear weapons,” Jean-Pierre said. He said: “We take the threat and all threats of any escalation very seriously … “I don’t think there’s any such thing as an ability to easily use a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon.” We have a clear stance on how to proceed.” Charles Michel, the president of the European Council, said that gathering had shown strong determination to support Ukraine and “firmness in our condemnation of Russia”.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "WJXT News4JAX"

Biden's statement on nuclear 'Armageddon' risk brings back ... (WJXT News4JAX)

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – If you are under 50, you may not know about fallout shelters and nuclear bomb threats. President Joe Biden said Thursday night that the ...

[JaxReady.com](http://jaxready.com/) has information to help residents ready their households for emergencies, including instructions for sheltering in place and reacting to a major terrorism or hazardous material incident. Members of the United Service Organizations were downtown on Friday — not for any military reason but to prepare for a half-marathon on Saturday. This was during the Cuban Missile Crisis. “I remember seeing videos where they would do the air raid, or the bomb thing, and you see the kids get under their desks and everything. Air raid shelter signs were once commonplace — not anymore. This was a film that was actually used nationwide for training.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The Detroit News"

Biden: Nuclear 'Armageddon' risk highest since '62 crisis (The Detroit News)

“We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis,” he added. He suggested the threat from Putin is real “because his ...

The White House had been avoiding applying the “war criminal” label to Putin, because it requires investigation and an international determination. There’s some concern in the administration that Russia has determined it can use its nuclear arsenal in a manner short of a “full-blown” nuclear attack on Ukraine and face only limited reaction from U.S. The White House said after the interview that U.S. and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said. We are going to keep cool heads and we will, each time, denounce the irresponsible character of these threats.” men and women, would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. “But overseas countries are saying, ‘Whoa, this is what the U.S. “We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis,” he added. “I have always refused to engage in political fiction, and especially ... when speaking of nuclear weapons,” Macron said at a EU summit in Prague. She told reporters: “Russia’s talk of using nuclear weapons is irresponsible and there’s no way to use them without unintended consequences. The president’s grim assessment, delivered during a Democratic fundraiser on Thursday night, rippled around the globe and appeared to edge beyond the boundaries of current U.S.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The Washington Post"

'Armageddon' warning reflects Biden's instincts about Putin (The Washington Post)

President Biden's warning this week that Russia's threats to use nuclear weapons amounted to the most serious “prospect of Armageddon in 60 years” was not ...

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Los Angeles Times"

Risk of nuclear 'Armageddon' highest since 1962, Biden says (Los Angeles Times)

The president says the risk of a catastrophic nuclear showdown is at its highest level since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis. Did he say too much?

The White House had been avoiding applying the “war criminal” label to Putin, because it requires investigation and an international determination. There’s some concern in the administration that Russia has determined it can use its nuclear arsenal in a manner short of a “full-blown” nuclear attack on Ukraine and face only limited reaction from U.S. and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said. The White House said after the interview that U.S. We are going to keep cool heads and we will, each time, denounce the irresponsible character of these threats.” men and women, would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion. “But overseas countries are saying, ‘Whoa, this is what the U.S. As for Biden’s latest eyebrow-raising remarks, “People sort of say, ‘Oh, yeah, it’s Biden. “I have always refused to engage in political fiction, and especially ... when speaking of nuclear weapons,” Macron said at a EU summit in Prague. She told reporters: “Russia’s talk of using nuclear weapons is irresponsible and there’s no way to use them without unintended consequences. The president’s grim assessment, delivered during a Democratic fundraiser on Thursday night, rippled around the globe and appeared to edge beyond the boundaries of current U.S.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Associated Press"

Biden's 'Armageddon' talk edges beyond bounds of US intel (Associated Press)

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden's warning that the world is at risk of a nuclear “Armageddon” was designed to send an unvarnished message that no one ...

The White House had been avoiding applying the “war criminal” label to Putin, because it requires investigation and an international determination. Last month, Biden, in a CBS “60 Minutes” interview, said that “U.S. There’s some concern in the administration that Russia has determined it can use its nuclear arsenal in a manner short of a “full-blown” nuclear attack on Ukraine and face only limited reaction from U.S. The White House said after the interview that U.S. and when the territorial integrity of our country is threatened, to protect Russia and our people, we will certainly use all the means at our disposal,” Putin said. We are going to keep cool heads and we will, each time, denounce the irresponsible character of these threats.” “We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis,” he added. “I have always refused to engage in political fiction, and especially ... when speaking of nuclear weapons,” Macron said at a EU summit in Prague. She told reporters: “Russia’s talk of using nuclear weapons is irresponsible and there’s no way to use them without unintended consequences. The president’s grim assessment, delivered during a Democratic fundraiser on Thursday night, rippled around the globe and appeared to edge beyond the boundaries of current U.S. [strategic setbacks on the battlefield](/article/united-nations-general-assembly-russia-ukraine-kyiv-business-d1355f7c528a10c872e2a26b9d532e16).

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Washington Examiner"

Biden's nuclear 'Armageddon' warning raises questions about ... (Washington Examiner)

President Joe Biden sounded the alarm over nuclear “Armageddon,” delivering a stark warning of the risks of escalation in Russia's war in Ukraine before ...

He continued, “[The Russians] will become more of a pariah in the world than they ever have been. The president responded, “You think I would tell you if I knew exactly what it would be? “It undercuts deterrence for the president to sound anxious about Russian nuclear threats,” said Schake, a former National Security Council and State Department official. “We have communicated that directly to the Russians,” White House national security adviser [Jake Sullivan](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/jake-sullivan) said in September. And we will continue to support Ukraine’s efforts until they fully liberate their country,’” Schake said. And I think that is extremely important.” “Russia’s talk of using nuclear weapons is irresponsible, and there’s no way to use them without unintended consequences. Biden also wondered about an “off-ramp” for Putin, asking, “Where does he find a way out? While speaking Wednesday at the Warsaw Security Forum, Dutch Adm. During a 60 Minutes interview last month, Biden was asked what consequences Russia might face for using the weapons. [Volodymyr Zelensky](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/volodymyr-zelensky) urged [NATO](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/nato) to take “preventative action” against [Russian](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/russia) targets so Russia knows “what awaits them if they use nuclear weapons.” [Joe Biden](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/joe-biden) [sounded the alarm](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/defense-national-security/biden-nuclear-armageddon-russia) over nuclear “Armageddon,” delivering a stark warning of the risks of escalation in Russia’s [war in Ukraine](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/war-in-ukraine) before prominent donors and [raising further questions](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/biden-russia-nuclear-armageddon) about U.S.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The Hill"

The Memo: Biden's 'armageddon' warning raises fresh questions (The Hill)

“We have not seen any reason to adjust our own strategic nuclear posture, nor do we have indications that Russia is preparing to imminently use nuclear weapons, ...

There would certainly be new moves to completely cut Russia off from every actor on the planet, whereas now China and Saudi Arabia are still giving oxygen to this leader.” His career has been long enough to encompass an era when there were real worries about nuclear war with the Soviet Union. “When the territorial integrity of our country is threatened … He suggested this could be done by using weapons supplied by the U.S. On the other hand, there is a legitimate question of whether he overstepped with the “armageddon” remark, perhaps raising the very tensions he is seeking to ease. The gravity of the situation, Wilkie argued, “demands going to the American people and explaining what’s at issue and what’s at stake — instead of these off-script, ‘I’m a tough guy’ moments.” Instead, he suggested, “all options would be available and nuclear would be one of them, but that is not the preferred choice. had warned Russia that there would be “catastrophic” consequences in the event of such a move. and other Western powers “to complete the encirclement of Putin’s troops in Crimea — meaning weapons would be used to take out their lines of retreat there, but NATO forces would never touch the ground in Ukraine.” In a speech last week, he said that the United States had created a “precedent” for the use of nuclear weapons by its atomic bomb attacks on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War. The Biden administration has been adamant that it will not put American “boots on the ground” in Ukraine, even as it backs Kyiv with billions of dollars in military aid. Jean-Pierre sought to cast the president’s words as a general warning about the dangers of an escalation and as a riposte to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s saber-rattling — not as an actual prediction that there would be a nuclear attack.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The Indian Express"

Russia-Ukraine war: Why Biden has warned of a threat of nuclear ... (The Indian Express)

Joe Biden, in his most outspoken remarks yet, warned about the stakes of nuclear weapons in the war between Russia and Ukraine.

On September 21, Putin announced a partial mobilisation drive of 300,000 reservists to assist in his military campaign, indicating that he is unlikely to disengage his forces from Ukraine any time soon. Other Western leaders have been more cautious in openly speaking about the threat of nuclear war. Since Ukraine’s invasion on February 24, Putin has repeatedly made blunt, personal criticisms of Putin. During Putin’s announcement in September, when he said he would use all means at his disposal to protect his territory, Putin claimed that the atomic bombs that the US dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 had “created a precedent” for the use of nuclear weapons. Putin in September had hinted at Russia’s nuclear arsenal in his announcement to annex four partially occupied regions of Ukraine. [NATO](https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/everyday-explainers/what-is-nato-why-is-russia-so-insecure-about-ukraine-joining-us-led-alliance-7805037/) officials of making statements about “the possibility and admissibility of using [weapons of mass destruction](https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/everyday-explainers/explained-weapons-of-mass-destruction-law-amendment-7856169/) against Russia – nuclear weapons,” Putin warned that Russia had “lots of weapons to reply.”

Explore the last week