Hunter Biden

Federal prosecutors believe they could charge Hunter Biden with tax crimes and a false statement but a final decision still has not yet been made by the US ...

The President, meanwhile, has repeatedly said he won’t interfere in the independence of the Justice Department. Biden described in media interviews last year that he was addicted to drugs, which raised the possibility he broke federal law when he bought the firearm. The discussions included assessing the strength of the case and questioning whether more work was needed before deciding on charges, according to sources who A decision is not expected before the midterm election. [Washington Post reported ](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-tax-gun-charges/)on Thursday that prosecutors believe they have “sufficient evidence” to charge Biden, son of President Joe Biden, in two areas – tax crimes and a false statement regarding a gun purchase, the same crimes CNN reported in July were the focus of investigators’ discussions with the Justice Department. [Hunter Biden](https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2022/07/27/hunter-biden-emails-debt-overdue-back-taxes-insufficient-funds-investigation-griffin-pkg-lead-vpx.cnn) with tax crimes and a false statement but a final decision still has not yet been made by the US attorney in Delaware, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, revealed shortly after his father's defeat of President Donald Trump in 2020 that he was under criminal ...

The Post in its report noted that the potential gun-related charge stems from Hunter's October 2018 purchase of a handgun, which required him to fill out a federal form that asked whether he was a user of or addicted to narcotics. They should not be pressured, rushed, or criticized for doing their job." In a statement to NBC News, Chris Clark, Hunter Biden's lawyer, said: "It is a federal felony for a federal agent to leak information about a Grand Jury investigation such as this one. "That is the job of the prosecutors. Any agent you cite as a source in your article apparently has committed such a felony. - It is now up to U.S.

A U.S. Attorney in Delaware appointed by former President Donald Trump still has to decide whether to bring charges against the president's son, ...

According to nonprofit fact-checking website [Politifact](https://www.politifact.com/article/2021/jun/14/donald-trumps-i-was-right-about-everything-fact-ch/), “nothing from the laptop has revealed illegal or unethical behavior by Joe Biden as vice president with regard to his son’s tenure as a director for Burisma, a Ukraine-based natural gas company.” It is unclear whether the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop played a role in the Justice Department investigation, the Post reported Thursday. The Justice Department’s investigation was originally centered on Hunter Biden’s financial and business dealings in foreign countries, including his work for businesses and tycoons in Ukraine and China, starting when Joe Biden served as vice president. [CNN](https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/20/politics/hunter-biden-investigation-critical-juncture/index.html) in July. Ethical questions have been raised over the years about Hunter Biden’s consulting and investment work abroad, including whether he properly paid taxes for that work. Few individuals tend to face charges for false statements related to gun purchases, which the Justice Department calls “lying and buying,” according to the Post. The story about the laptop was amplified by many conservative outlets and claimed the cache of evidence from the computer implicated Hunter and other members of the Biden family in several scandals, including improper business deals as well as a conspiracy theory that Joe Biden engaged in illicit activities relating to his son’s employment with the Ukrainian natural gas and oil company Burisma.

Hunter Biden, the president's wayward son, may face federal charges for tax improprieties and lying on an application to buy a gun.

But while conservatives have pushed the unfounded claim that Biden was involved in a kickback scheme involving the Ukrainian company Burisma, with his father on the take, he is being investigated for more pedestrian — if still serious — conduct. In a statement to the Post, Biden’s lawyer Chris Clark focused on the confidentiality of the ongoing probe. The Post notes that it is “relatively rare” for such gun cases to be prosecuted and that prosecutors have wide discretion on whether to pursue them. Attorney General Merrick Garland has made assurances that there will be no political interference in the case. Biden [made a $2 million tax payment](https://news.yahoo.com/hunter-biden-rep-says-2m-113905609.html) earlier this year that he might have hoped would forestall any charges. An investigation into his taxes has been ongoing for many years; as the New York

President Joe Biden's son has been under federal investigation since 2018. The decision on whether to file criminal charges now rests with the US Attorney in ...

He first admitted knowledge of an investigation in December 2020. Mr Clark added that he has had no contact "whatsoever" with any federal investigators. In a book published last year he had admitted to still being a heavy user of crack cocaine at that time. He was discharged from the US Navy in 2014 after testing positive for cocaine. They should not be pressured, rushed, or criticised for doing their job." In a statement sent to CBS, a lawyer for the president's son said that he expected the Department of Justice to "diligently investigate and prosecute" those who leaked information about the investigation.

The Washington Post reports that federal agents believe they have enough evidence to support charging Hunter Biden with tax crimes.

[The Washington Post](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-tax-gun-charges/) or [ at CNBC](https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/06/hunter-biden-case-feds-believe-evidence-supports-tax-and-gun-charges.html). In a statement to NBC News, Chris Clark, Hunter Biden’s lawyer, said: “It is a federal felony for a federal agent to leak information about a Grand Jury investigation such as this one. Any agent you cite as a source in your article apparently has committed such a felony.

Agents months ago gathered what they believe is sufficient evidence to charge the president's son with crimes related to taxes and making a false statement ...

He had been acting head of the Delaware office at the time and received the endorsements of the state's U.S. Biden said in October 2020 at a presidential debate. A federal subpoena from that year, obtained by CBS News, sought Hunter Biden's bank records dating back to 2014, when Joe Biden was vice president. A December 2020 subpoena requested documents as far back as January 2017, "regarding (Hunter) Biden's income, assets, debts, obligations, and financial transactions… Biden's team believes the bureau is trying to pressure prosecutors to act. That is the job of the prosecutors," Clark said.

Federal agents investigating Hunter Biden believe there is enough evidence to charge the president's son with tax crimes.

He was appointed under the Trump administration. The Washington Post on Thursday What is the latest on the investigation?

“Federal agents investigating President Biden's son Hunter have gathered what they believe is sufficient evidence to charge him with tax crimes and a false ...

In October 2016, more and more people inside the FBI were starting to harbor serious doubts about decisions made above them, and they were starting to talk. A Trump appointee likely wouldn’t kill a strong case to protect the Biden family — and if there was interference from elsewhere in DOJ or the administration, he could make that known. [ wrote a book](https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Beautiful-Things/Hunter-Biden/9781982151126) about it), he bought a gun. Indeed, one of the reporters who broke the Thursday story — Barrett — landed a similar scoop in October 2016 for the Wall Street Journal. That wouldn’t get him off the hook for past criminal conduct, and the [Wall Street Journal reports](https://www.wsj.com/articles/prosecutors-advance-tax-probe-of-hunter-biden-11648465200) prosecutors are examining whether Hunter “moved funds in a way to obscure his tax liability.” This seems to be an open-and-shut crime — he said on the form he wasn’t a drug user, but he was. Then, in 2018, the [tax inquiry became](https://www.wsj.com/articles/barr-worked-to-keep-hunter-biden-probes-from-public-view-during-election-11607653188) a broader criminal investigation into Hunter, conducted by the US attorney’s office in Delaware, examining possible money laundering and whether he was an unregistered foreign agent. It does reveal, though, that they think the evidence is strong enough to charge Hunter in two areas. (US Attorney David Weiss of Delaware, a Trump appointee, is overseeing the investigation.) However, agents do not get to make the decision about filing charges — prosecutors in the Justice Department do, and the story contains no details about their current thinking. [ at least this spring](https://www.vox.com/23012186/hunter-biden-investigation-tax-fara). The news here is that agents investigating the case think they’ve assembled a case worth charging.