Codify

2022 - 7 - 19

Post cover
Image courtesy of "ABC News"

House passes bill codifying same-sex marriage right, with some ... (ABC News)

The House of Representatives on Tuesday passed a bill to codify the right to gay marriage in the wake of the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade.

If that decision is overturned, this bill is crucial -- and we don't know what this court is going to do," he said. (Democratic leaders in the House said this week they will also vote on a bill codifying contraception access.) After being passed by the House, the bill moves to a split Senate where Republican support is possible, too, if fragmented. I will look at what the House is doing and see what that might mean here on the Senate side," Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said Tuesday morning. "If that decision is not overturned, this bill is unnecessary but harmless. It would also repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, which was found to be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In his separate opinion from the majority, Thomas wrote that the court should next revisit its opinion in Obergefell v. Concern among some lawmakers and advocates about the legal fate of same-sex marriage mounted after Justice Clarence Thomas' concurrence in the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. "Congress should provide additional reassurance that marriage equality is a matter of settled law. Wade -- with one justice writing that the right to same-sex marriage should also be reversed. In 2021, Cheney reversed her opinion and said, "I was wrong." The final vote was 267-157, with 47 Republicans joining every Democrat in the majority.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Axios"

House passes bill to codify marriage equality with large bipartisan ... (Axios)

Almost 50 Republicans voted yes. The legislation is part of Democrats' response to the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

- 47 Republicans voted for the legislation. House Republican leadership isn't telling their members how to vote on a bill to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and codify federal recognition for same-sex and interracial marriages but is instead advising them to vote their conscience, a senior GOP aide told Axios. - The bill was introduced by a group of top House and Senate Democrats as well as Collins. - House Republican leadership did not tell their members how to vote on the bill, but it instead advised them to vote their conscience, a senior GOP aide told Axios. The bill has one Republican sponsor, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), but none in the House. Driving the news: A bipartisan group of lawmakers on Monday introduced the Respect for Marriage Act, which requires states to recognize all marriages if they were valid in the states they were performed. Almost 50 House Republicans joined Democrats to pass legislation on Tuesday that would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and enshrine marriage equality into federal law.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Milwaukee Journal Sentinel"

Wisconsin Republican Bryan Steil joins House Democrats in vote to ... (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)

Wisconsin Republican Rep. Bryan Steil joined Democrats Tuesday in voting to codify same-sex marriage. The rest of the GOP delegation opposed the bill.

"This bill is a prime example of what the Justices warned against and is nothing more than a brazen attempt to fearmonger." "And take seriously those among our colleagues who have criticized the Obergefell decision." The measure, called the Respect for Marriage Act, passed the House on a vote of 267-157. I want to make sure that my husband is taken care of just like your spouses are taken care of." I want to make sure my husband has my earned benefits for retirement and social security. Hodges decision, which gave same-sex couples the right to marry.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "USA TODAY"

House votes to codify same-sex marriage, fearing Supreme Court ... (USA TODAY)

The House passed the "Respect for Marriage Act," which protects same-sex marriage. It faces an uphill battle to get 60 votes in the Senate.

"There's a black hole that even the Webb Telescope can't fight through to find out what's happening in the Senate," he said. "It reminds us that we cannot take for granted the inevitability of progress." Thomas was the only justice to explicitly indicate the Court could revisit same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage was one of a handful of personal rights called into question in Justice Clarence Thomas's concurring opinion on the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Thomas said other rights that fall under substantive due process could be overturned by the court in the future. Republican members said the bill needed to go through question and debate in the Judiciary Committee.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "cleveland.com"

House passes bill to codify gay marriage over Republican ... (cleveland.com)

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio led opposition on the House of Representatives floor.

“If you do not protect marriage equality, you are saying that we, and our families, do not belong in ‘We the People,’” Obergefell testified at a hearing on how the Supreme Court’s abortion decision might affect other rights. He introduced legislation in 2009 to block the District of Columbia from recognizing same-sex marriages performed elsewhere, boycotted a conservative event because of a gay group’s participation and gave his ticket to a presidential “State of the Union” speech to a county clerk from Kentucky who went to jail for refusing to provide marriage licenses to gay people. Before the Obergefell decision was issued, Jordan, Rep. Bob Gibbs of Holmes County and Rep. Bob Latta of Bowling Green supported a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would define marriage as “only the union of a man or a woman.” Ohio was one of several dozen states where gay marriage was illegal before the Obergefell decision. A press spokesman for Portman said he will consponsor the bill in the Senate. Hodges decision on gay marriage, as well as decisions in cases that overturned sodomy laws and established the rights of married people to obtain contraceptives. Obergefell, who is currently a state legislative candidate in Ohio, last week urged the House Judiciary Committee to safeguard gay marriage. Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.” Backers of the legislation argued it is necessary after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its 1973 Roe v. “This is what they intend to do.” Justice Clarence Thomas filed a concurring opinion that argued the court should also overturn the Obergefell v. It would also bar states from failing to recognize interracial marriages, as several did before a 1967 Supreme Court decision overturned those laws.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "The New York Times"

House Moves to Protect Same-Sex Marriage From Supreme Court ... (The New York Times)

The legislation, which garnered some Republican support, would recognize same-sex marriages at the federal level. It faces an uncertain path in the Senate.

“Every legislator has votes they regret, and to this day, that vote was one of the most difficult I’ve had to take.” The legislation passed on Tuesday would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996, which defined a marriage as the union between a man and a woman, a law that was struck down by the court but has remained on the books. The House vote reflected a shift among Republicans on same-sex marriage as public opinion polls have shown that a majority of the party supports it. And in 2006, just 27 House Republicans opposed an effort to amend the Constitution to bar same-sex marriage. It’s good public policy being made in a way that it’s supposed to be.” The bloc of Republicans who supported the measure amounted to less than a quarter of the party conference, but that was a far greater proportion than gay rights legislation has drawn in the past from G.O.P. lawmakers. “The Respect for Marriage Act will further add stability and certainty for these children and families.” The legislation would mandate that the federal government recognize a marriage if it was valid in the state where it was performed, which would address the patchwork of differing state laws. But Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the minority leader, declined on Tuesday to state a position on the bill. Over the weekend, Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, said he agreed, asserting in an interview for his podcast that Obergefell and Roe v. The debate in Congress thrust the issue into the midterm election campaign, where Democrats are eager to draw a distinction between their party’s support for L.G.B.T.Q. rights and opposition by many Republicans. But the No. 3 Republican, Representative Elise Stefanik of New York, and Representative Tom Emmer of Minnesota, the G.O.P. campaign committee chairman, were in favor.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Texas Tribune"

Only one Republican Texas congress member voted to protect ... (Texas Tribune)

U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales was the only Texas Republican to vote for a bill seeking to codify the right to same-sex marriage. The measure passed the House, ...

The Senate is slated to go on a four-week recess in August. “I believe this law is key to rejecting the interpretation of Justice Clarence Thomas,” Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Houston, said on the House floor Tuesday morning. Texas voters overwhelmingly voted to ban same-sex marriage in 2005, but several district court rulings had declared that unconstitutional. The vote is one of several that House Democrats have planned in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark and deeply polarizing decision last month to overturn Roe v. The bill effectively codifies into federal law the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. At least one Republican supports it: Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, is a sponsor of the legislation.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Cincinnati.com"

4 Ohio Republicans in Congress side with Democrats to codify gay ... (Cincinnati.com)

Four Ohio Republicans joined Democrats in Congress Tuesday in approving legislation that would enshrine federal protections for same-sex and interracial ...

The legislation approved Tuesday would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and codify protections for same-sex and interracial marriage. It was passed in 1996 by a GOP-controlled Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton. The Supreme Court deemed it unconstitutional under Obergefell and an earlier case, but the law is still technically on the books. "I thought the Democrats were obsessed with President Trump, but Justice Thomas is a close second," Jordan said. Roe was grounded in the 14th Amendment's guarantee of due process, which also serves as the foundation of the landmark gay marriage ruling in Obergefell v. Jackson Women's Health, multiple justices said the majority's ruling only applied to abortion rights. U.S. House Democrats pushed for the vote amid concerns over how the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando"

House passes bipartisan bill to federally codify same-sex marriages (WKMG News 6 & ClickOrlando)

The “Respect for Marriage Act,” a bill aimed at federally codifying same-sex marriages, passed the House of Representatives Tuesday in a vote of 267-157.

The current provisions for marriages were ruled unconstitutional in the 2013 Supreme Court case United States v. OSHA inspects Amazon warehouse in Orlando following workplace complaints [TRENDING: Cities with most expensive homes in Orlando metro area

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Daily Mail"

House PASSES bill that would codify same-sex marriage in federal ... (Daily Mail)

The vote on the Defense of Marriage Act came amid concerns that the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v. Wade abortion access could jeopardize other ...

The Respect For Marriage Act would repeal the controversial Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman. Democrat Rep. Jerry Nadler suggested that Justice Clarence Thomas did not suggest revisiting the Supreme Court ruling that legalized interracial marriage because he himself is married to a white woman. The House on Tuesday night passed a bill that would recognize same-sex marriage in federal law. The law was gutted by the Supreme Court but remains on the books - meaning it could be enforceable again if the 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Thomas reaffirms this in his concurring opinion, as well - before using that to suggest looking at other cases in order to re-examine those precedents separately. Is that really the most pressing issue facing our country? But Johnson insisted that the right to same-sex marriage was not under attack and that Democrats were 'manufacturing' the issue Forty-seven Republicans joined all Democrats in sending the Defense of Marriage Act to the Senate where it faces a tougher challenge of getting through Democrat Rep. Jerry Nadler suggested that Justice Clarence Thomas did not suggest revisiting the Supreme Court ruling that legalized interracial marriage because he himself is married to a white woman. Forty-seven Republicans joined all Democrats in sending the Defense of Marriage Act to the Senate where it faces a tougher challenge of getting through. The House on Tuesday night voted 267 to 157 to pass a bill that would recognize same-sex marriage in federal law. - The House voted 267 to 157 on Tuesday to advance the Defense of Marriage Act

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Spectrum News"

All but one NY House member votes to codify same-sex marriage in ... (Spectrum News)

BUFFALO, N.Y. -- New York state passed the Marriage Equality Act in 2011, and in the 2015 Obergefell decision, the Supreme Court ruled same-sex couples had ...

"We have a right-wing Supreme Court that's out of control, and Congress is asserting its authority against this court," he said. "Anything is on the chopping block now given what the Supreme Court has done and given the extreme political rhetoric of the United States Supreme Court," Higgins said. Rep. Brian Higgins, D-NY-26, said he doesn't share that opinion following the court's decision to overturn Roe.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Los Angeles Times"

Post-Roe bill to codify same-sex marriage could pass Senate (Los Angeles Times)

In an unexpected fallout of the Supreme Court's reversal of abortion rights, codifying same-sex marriage nationwide has a shot in the divided Senate.

Jackson Women’s Health Organization abortion case, said that after Roe, the court should reconsider its previous rulings on same-sex marriage and contraception. The court struck down DOMA in its 2015 Obergefell vs. Democrats are hoping the first glimmers of support from Republicans will snowball into wider support. But in a nod to the dramatic swing some Republicans have undertaken on the issue, there are signs some will cross party lines. Virginia case in 1967. In an unexpected consequence of the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Roe vs.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "oregonlive.com"

US House passes bill to codify same-sex marriage (oregonlive.com)

The U.S. House overwhelmingly approved legislation Tuesday to protect same-sex and interracial marriages amid concerns that the Supreme Court ruling ...

Hodges, which established the rights of same-sex couples to marry nationwide, a landmark case for gay rights. But last month, writing for the majority in overturning Roe v. It would also provide legal protections for interracial marriages by prohibiting any state from denying out-of-state marriage licenses and benefits on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity or national origin. A Gallup poll in June showed broad and increasing support for same-sex marriage, with 70% of U.S. adults saying they think such unions should be recognized by law as valid. While the Respect for Marriage Act easily passed the House with a Democratic majority, it is likely to stall in the evenly split Senate, where most Republicans would probably join a filibuster to block it. Or will they vote to let states take those freedoms away?” Another bill, guaranteeing access to contraceptive services, is set for a vote later this week. Will they vote to protect these fundamental freedoms? “Congress can’t allow that to happen.” Capitol Police said among those arrested were 16 members of Congress. Instead leading Republicans portrayed the bill as unnecessary amid other issues facing the nation. “We are here for a political charade, we are here for political messaging,” said Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "WJXT News4JAX"

Rep. Rutherford votes 'no' on codifying same-sex, interracial ... (WJXT News4JAX)

The bill passed with a 267-157 margin, receiving 100% support from Democrats and from 47 Republicans.

We still have in the state of Florida, a ban on same-sex marriage on the books, if Obergefell is overturned, we go back to the standing order in Florida, which is going to nullify tens of thousands of marriages and break apart families and no good can come of that.” News4JAX also reached out to the campaigns of his primary challengers, Leigha Garner-Lopez and Mara Macie, but did not receive a response as of publication. We unfortunately don’t have any availability for an interview today, but Senator Scott is reviewing the legislation.” “I am strongly in support of equal rights for everyone. News4JAX also reached out to Senator Rick Scott for comment. News4JAX reached out to Rutherford and his office for an explanation for his vote but did not receive a response as of this article’s publication.

Post cover
Image courtesy of "Brooklyn Paper"

Malliotakis votes with Democratic colleagues to codify same-sex ... (Brooklyn Paper)

Nicole Malliotakis, Brooklyn's only Republican congressmember, broke with her past stances and voted to codify protections for same-sex marriage along with.

“And, although Justice Thomas did not mention the right to interracial marriage, that right relies on the same constitutional doctrines as the right to same-sex marriage and, therefore, it could be vulnerable to a legal challenge in the future as well,” Nadler said on the House floor ahead of the vote. “I introduced the first domestic partnership legislation in New York State history when I served on the New York City Council in 1986,” Maloney said in a statement. In his opinion, Thomas questioned not only the court’s prior opinion on Roe, but on the Supreme Court decisions that legalized same-sex marriage, prohibited criminal punishments for sodomy, and granted married couples the right to access contraception. The bill was introduced by U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who represents large parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn, in response to a concurring opinion issued by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas when the court overturned Roe v. The bill also prohibits states that do not recognize same-sex marriage from discriminating against married couples from other states on the basis of race, sex and ethnicity. Today, I will vote to codify same-sex marriage to ensure our fellow Americans continue to have the right to equal marriage and benefits under federal law.”

Explore the last week