The 6 January select committee may have only nine members, but several of them are among the most high-profile members of the House of Representatives.
His actions are the most serious offence against our Constitution and our country. If we don’t act now, the Impeachment Clause would essentially be meaningless. It’s important to remember: Impeachment is not about punishing the president; it is about protecting the American people from constitutional violations so extreme they threaten the country’s future.” “The actions were in public. During the Clinton impeachment, Ms Lofgren concluded (like almost all Democrats and some Republicans) that the president had not abused his power. “I’m the only Member of Congress who’s been involved in all three of the last Presidential impeachments,” she said in prepared remarks on the House floor.
Rep. Zoe Lofgren was at work on Capitol Hill each of the four times Congress moved to impeach a president in modern U.S. history, first as a staffer and ...
“There was a plan in place to prevent the peaceful transfer of power that the Constitution provides. Then-President Trump “didn’t like losing, but he knew he lost, and he lied about it,” Lofgren said. “And I know that that’s true.” “There were very serious mistakes made in the Department of Defense,” Lofgren said. “I’d gone into this wondering whether there had been an actual attempt on the part of the political appointees to prevent the assistance from arriving. The president was told that and continued to make these false statements.” “For example, there was a report about a truck driver who had supposedly had a whole truckload of ballots. Now it’s pretty clear that the belief that the election had been stolen was a huge motivator for much of the mob on Jan. 6.” “Even before the election, he indicated that if he lost it, it would have to be stolen. Former President Trump was the subject of two of those inquiries. But the panel’s presentation Monday is expected to again include pre-recorded video testimony along with in-person witnesses. “There were allegations against suitcases of ballots.
The January 6th committee will detail the findings from its yearlong bipartisan investigation of the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 with its ...
And we will see this one day as the outrageous attack on our system, on the prior president, on scores of people that it truly is," he added. And the courts upheld the will of the people." "He ignored the will of the voters. But I always felt that after the election he didn't seem to be listening and I didn't think it was, you know, that I was inclined not to stay around if he wasn't listening to advice from me or his other cabinet secretaries." And it seemed to be based on the dynamic that at the end of the evening a lot of Democratic votes came in, which changed the vote counts in certain states. “He took the number of applications for the Republican primary and he compared it to the number of absentee votes cast in the general election. “I reiterated that they wasted a whole month on these claims, on the Dominion voting machines, and they were idiotic claims,” he said. “And on the other hand, you know, when I went into this and would you know, tell him how crazy some of these allegations were, there was never an indication of interest in what the actual facts were.” “The mayor was definitely intoxicated, but I do not know his level of intoxication when he spoke with the president, for example,” Miller said in videotaped testimony aired at the hearing. “We found that the suitcase full of ballots, the alleged black suitcase that was being seen pulled from under the table was actually an official lockbox where ballots were kept safe,” he said. “President Trump continued to push the stolen election narrative, even though he and his allies knew that their litigation efforts making the same claim had failed,” she added. “The problem is that Mastriano threw out this number and what he did was he mixed apples and oranges,” Barr testified.
South Bay Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) assumed one of the leading roles Monday in the second public hearing of the House committee investigating.
WASHINGTON — The commission investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection will continue laying out its detailed evidence that former President Donald Trump ...
Over two hours on Thursday, Thompson and Cheney laid out the overarching theme the committee will attempt to drive home through its hearings: that Trump knowingly spread false information about the election being stolen to fan the flames of what amounted to an attempted coup. Because Republican leadership decided to boycott the committee, the hearings will have no counter-voices, allowing the events to be heavily produced and choreographed to lay out the intended case. “I’m not going to do most of the talking,” Lofgren said. “There were two reasons: One, he raised a huge amount of money after the election had been certified, but he also wanted to set the stage for overthrowing the election by casting doubt that the election was legitimate; and actually the two were combined — the fundraising emails and texts were extravagant lies that raised money but also helped distribute the propaganda.” Lofgren is one of nine members on the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol, and said members are taking turns leading different hearings. Her goal: to establish that Trump spread the narrative that the 2020 presidential election was stolen despite being clearly informed that it was untrue.
The Jan. 6 committee investigating the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol continued its series of public hearings on Monday morning with testimony that shed ...
You can select 'Manage settings' for more information and to manage your choices. You can change your choices at any time by visiting Your Privacy Controls. Find out more about how we use your information in our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. Click here to find out more about our partners. - Information about your device and internet connection, including your IP address
Here is the New York Times account of today's hearing. The one big theme on the second day of hearings by the Jan. 6 committee was that former President Trump ...
According to the committee, that PAC sent $1 million to a charitable foundation run by Mark Meadows, his former chief of staff, and another $1 million to a political group that is run by several of his former staff members, including Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump’s immigration agenda. He expressed pride that his team was first to accurately call the Arizona results and said there was “zero” chance that Trump would have won that state. Instead, he listened to Giuliani, who aides said was drunk that night and was urging the president to claim victory and say the election was being stolen. Trump chose, in the words of “Team Normal,” to listen to those spouting “crazy” arguments instead. It was also “the big rip-off.” In his testimony, Barr said he told the president repeatedly that his claims of fraud were unfounded, but that there was “never an indication of interest in what the actual facts are.” Barr said that in the weeks after the election, he repeatedly told Trump “how crazy some of these allegations were.” Stepien said in the video that he had urged the president not to declare victory prematurely, having already explained that Democratic votes were likely to be counted later in the night. But Barr’s testimony offered another possible explanation: that the president actually came to believe the lies he was telling. “So not only was there that big lie, there was the big rip-off," she said. Lofgren was a member of the House Judiciary Committee in 1998 when it approved articles of impeachment against President Bill Clinton for lying about an affair with a White House intern. But he made the fake claim on election night anyway, and hasn’t stopped since.
The panel heard testimony from a former Fox News digital politics editor, a conservative lawyer, a former Georgia US attorney and a former GOP election official ...
Stepien was perhaps the most intriguing witness, as a key member of Trump's team during the 2020 campaign. Byung “BJay” Pak, a former Atlanta-area US attorney, resigned as Trump was pushing baseless election fraud claims is set to testify today. The committee has been prepared for such contingencies and has at its disposal deposition video clips from Stepien’s earlier testimony, according to a source. Investigators from the Fulton County District Attorney’s office have already met with staffers from the Jan. 6 select committee to discuss overlap between their investigations. The committee is highlighting on Monday how Donald Trump and his close advisers knew their accusations of widespread fraud were false, yet continued to spread disinformation. Over the next two weeks, the congressional committee is slated to hear public testimony from three relevant witnesses in the Georgia probe. "His view was shared by many of the Trump team whom we interviewed," Vice Chairwoman Liz Cheney said. House select committee aides said the hearing would scrutinize how Trump embraced false claims of fraud in the 2020 election and how he decided to declare victory in the hours after the election, even though he was told that the numbers didn't bear it out. The big lie was also a big rip-off." "[Trump] didn't have the numbers. She also served as a staffer on Capitol Hill for eight years. House select committee aides said the hearing would scrutinize how Trump embraced false claims of fraud in the 2020 election and how he decided to declare victory in the hours after the election, even though he was told that the numbers didn't bear it out.