Former Acting ICE director Ron Vitiello on the potential end of Title 42 as the crisis at the southern border continues.
thousands of people coming into the United States every 24 hours, families, children, people in that pipeline being exploited for human trafficking, the drug smugglers, the cartels controlling the border, versus us and our agents out there patrolling the border." WHITE HOUSE ADMITS ENDING TITLE 42 WILL BRING ‘INFLUX OF PEOPLE TO THE BORDER' White House reportedly considering end to Title 42 in May
There have been complaints that the Biden administration doesn't have a plan for how to deal with the inevitable surge of illegal immigration that will ...
Now Democrats are coming out against Joe Biden ending Title 42, breaking with the party by claiming the administration doesn't have alternatives in place to ...
The sweeping, pandemic-related expulsion policy has effectively closed down the U.S. asylum system at the border with Mexico as officials don't have to hear asylum claims under Title 42. Biden continued Title 42 from Trump's presidency and defended the policy in court to help quell migration. Pictured: Biden receives a fourth dose of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine on Wednesday This would equate to more than 500,000 each month. These are real people there, right? They're aware of what they're about to release. 'These are people. Pictured: Central American migrants meet at a temporary camp in Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico on Wednesday March 30 'If Title 42 expires, as the border patrol has told me, they expect a tsunami of humanity to come across border and the border patrol has said they will lose control entirely,' Senator Cornyn said at a news conference on Capitol Hill Wednesday. She said in a statement following the meeting of her border state constituents and illegal border crossers: 'Ending Title 42 without a comprehensive plan in place puts at risk the health and safety of migrants and Arizona communities.' 'We spoke with the @DHSgov Secretary about the administration's Title 42 contingency plans following our letter to the President urging him not to end Title 42 without a comprehensive plan to support border communities,' Sinema tweeted Wednesday of her and Kelly's meeting. The tweet followed reports that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( CDC) will end the pandemic-era Title 42 policy on May 23 of this year – giving immigration agencies less than two months to prepare for a possible tripling of migration at the southern border.
Restrictions related to COVID-19 at the southern border could soon be coming to an end, but some Texas leaders would like to see certain restrictions ...
Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) is urging the Biden administration to rethink plans to rescind Title 42 amid reports the White House plans to unwind the ...
We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter. “As the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention relaxes it domestic COVID-19 protocols, it is perplexing that the agency continues to recommend the extended use of this draconian policy at the border, contradicting the overwhelming signs of America’s pandemic recovery under President Biden’s leadership,” Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) wrote in a letter earlier this month alongside Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). “With encounters along our southern border surging and the highly-transmissible Omicron BA.2 subvariant emerging as the dominate strain in the United States, now is not the time to throw caution to the wind,” Manchin wrote in a Tuesday letter to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Rochelle Walensky.
(WASHINGTON) — The Department of Homeland Security is expected to move forward this week with lifting Title 42 restrictions — the Trump-era order giving the ...
The agency is continuing its review and has yet to issue a formal decision, the CDC told ABC News in a statement. “Those inefficiencies translate into a weaker economy, fewer jobs and we can do better,” U.S. General Services Administrator Robin Carnahan told reporters at an event announcing the border funding. It’s impossible.” The $3.4 billion investment comes from the bipartisan infrastructure law. “This is not who we are as a country,” Schumer said earlier this month. “Continuing this Trump-era policy defies common sense and common decency.
(CNN) More migrants are coming to the US-Mexico border, and officials say they expect the number to grow. This is something we've seen many times before.
And the number of people trying to cross the border tends to go up in the spring. But Pinheiro told CNN last week she was concerned administration officials haven't done more to include advocates in their plans. for the US to stop vulnerable people from seeking asylum. In the border city of Del Rio, Texas, Tiffany Burrow told CNN's Rosa Flores this week that she's been seeing the increase at the respite center she directs. Some of them could seek entry within hours if the CDC rule is repealed, the official said. Experts say the economic hardships of the pandemic have further intensified migration trends.
The Joe Biden administration is on the way to withdrawing Title 42 border policy, implemented during the pandemic situation in the Trump era.
However, Border officials have stated their concerns that without any strict turnback policy, the withdrawal of Title 42 would lead the migration situation to the dangerous overcrowding in border facilities. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. However, Border officials have stated their concerns that without any strict turnback policy, the withdrawal of Title 42 would lead the migration situation to the dangerous overcrowding in border facilities. With the end of Title 42, the government will once again detain migrants before deporting them or releasing them to asylum. As per the official report, the policy has prevented more than 1.7 million immigrants from attempting to cross the border since the time the Trumpadministration implied it in March 2020. Title 42 has been used since 2020 to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.
EL PASO, Texas (Border Report) – One of the largest migrant advocacy agencies here says it's ready to cope with the end of a policy that has kept ...
Twenty-two members of the Texas congressional delegation are urging the Biden administration to keep Title 42 in place because border communities aren't ...
Moderate Democratic senators are expressing concern over reports that the Biden administration will lift the Title 42 public health order which has been ...
"Ending Title 42 without a comprehensive plan in place puts at risk the health and safety of migrants and Arizona communities," Sinema said in a statement. Meanwhile, Arizona Sens. Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema wrote to President Biden last week, warning him against ending the policy without a comprehensive plan in place. His office said he also asked for details about how increased funding approved in the recent omnibus for border management and security could be used. That ending Title 42 would supercharge the ongoing border crisis -- where authorities are already mass releasing migrants due to overcrowding and continued high migrant traffic -- has been tacitly acknowledged by the Biden administration. Activists and top Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer have called for the end to the policy, arguing that it is preventing migrants from claiming asylum. In February, approximately 55% of migrants were returned due to the order.
Expect DHS to flounder in responding to the massive surge of illegal migrants who will follow in the wake of Title 42's termination, but also expect the Biden ...
Most will now be rebranded “asylum seekers”, and under the way that DHS has rigged the game, they will be “asylum grantees” and placed on a path to citizenship. That assumes, however, that the president is allowed to get away with this plan — and that verdict will be handed down in the federal courts, and ultimately in the court of public opinion. This will be great for the upward of 18,000 aliens who will enter the United States daily after Title 42 ends. The Journal could have added that unlike in removal proceedings before an IJ, there also won’t be any “government lawyers” to appeal the AO’s decision, either — rendering the AO’s decision virtually final, so long as it is an asylum grant. Note the use of the word “temporary” in that phrase. Even if many step forward to assist CBP in the heat of a south Texas (or Sonoran Desert) summer, there is little that they will be able to do aside from making the migrants’ lives more comfortable. “Transform” is an understatement: My colleague Rob Law and I wrote about the significant downsides of that rule on March 24. After a high of 144,116 Southwest border encounters in May 2019, the Trump administration managed to get illegal immigration at the Southwest border under control. The one quasi-border control measure that Biden has kept has been Title 42 — which as I noted is not a border control measure at all. In November 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an injunction in which it held that unaccompanied alien children (UACs) were being improperly expelled under Title 42. DHS is expecting upwards of 18,000 illegal migrants per day at the Southwest border after Title 42 ends. Multiple media outlets report that CDC orders directing the expulsion of aliens who have entered illegally in response to the Covid-19 pandemic will end on May 23.
El Paso-area congressional leaders reacted with divergent opinions to recent reports that the Biden administration is preparing to lift Title 42, a.
Although federal and international law establishes a right to seek asylum in the United States, Title 42 has been used since March 2020 as a legal rationale to quickly expel migrants without letting them apply for asylum. NBC News reported that the policy will be lifted on May 23 according to unnamed officials. Gonzales’ congressional district stretches over 800 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border, from El Paso to Del Rio.
EL PASO, Texas (Border Report) – The Biden administration is making contingency plans to deal with a three-fold increase in migration upon lifting of the ...
Rights advocates welcome reported plan to end US border restriction in May, but demand immediate end to expulsions.
“We are extremely worried as to what that will look like for Haitians and other Black migrants.” The rule came into sharp focus in September last year, when more than 15,000 Haitians, among them many children, camped under a bridge in southern Texas hoping to claim asylum. Rights groups on Thursday said they are still waiting for confirmation that the administration will revoke the policy, known as Title 42, by May 23, as several news outlets reported this week. They also say it has inflicted massive human rights abuses on people seeking refuge. On Wednesday, after news agencies and local news outlets reported that the US planned to lift Title 42 in May, Biden told reporters that his administration would make a decision on the rule “soon”. “Title 42 has been an utter failure by all measures,” Reichlin-Melnick told Al Jazeera. “It hasn’t protected the public’s health, it has actively harmed asylum seekers and it has failed to limit the number of people coming to the border.”
The Biden administration is making contingency plans to deal with a three-fold increase in migration upon lifting of the Title 42 public health order, ...
El Paso migrant advocates are preparing for a surge at the border with the Biden Administration preparing to lift Title 42. “We have had to really get used ...
“When it comes to placement and where people are going to stay, that’s probably the biggest concern that we’re going to have as a region.” “We currently have four attorneys, and four legal assistants who provide representation in a variety of different cases but for anybody going through the immigration process.” “We will meet with them individually and try to asses their cases, we will continue to provide as many services to as many people as we can, we have expanded our department, the attorneys that work with this specific population over the last few years, so I really think we are prepared,” Lopez said.
“There is no plan,” Don McLaughlin, mayor of Uvalde, Texas – a town of approximately 15,000 which sits roughly 60 miles from the Mexico frontier – asserted this ...
When Title 42 goes away, I’m not sure what’s going to happen with customs and will they open up bridges.” How are they going to survive?” “We’re going to block that Highway 90.” To think they’re going to get worse, it’s hard to quantify that.” “They did it in three days,” the mayor noted. “I told them on the phone yesterday, ‘You’re the 800-pound gorilla.
Border Patrol agents are fearing that they are going to get hit by an enormous surge in migrants at the southern border if the Biden administration ends ...
"The only thing this administration is going to be able to do is just release people on a mass scale, that’s it, that’s all they can do." There are also believed to be a considerable number of migrants waiting in Mexican cities waiting for Title 42 to drop. Judd told Fox that busy parts of the border like Del Rio and Yuma Sectors are already seeing overcrowding to four times their capacity. There were more than 164,000 migrant encounters in February, and that number is expected to rise in March, putting considerable pressure on agents and facilities -- and that’s before the order is ended. "We can't even fly on airplanes without masks, but we’re going to end Title 42 which is going to cause the single largest flux of illegal immigration in our history?" In February, approximately 55% of the more than 164,000 migrants encountered were returned due to the order.
In March 2020, during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, then-President Donald Trump dusted off a decades-old public health law known as Title 42 to ...
Critics of the policy have repeatedly said its use is a misapplication of the law and is spurred by immigration concerns, not public-health worries. Officials from DHS said the administration is preparing by building new holding facilities, deploying more border agents and acquiring additional means of transportation. Trump’s public health order allowed for the rapid expulsion of nearly anyone trying to cross into the U.S. from Mexico or Canada, before they had the opportunity to seek asylum in the U.S. The Trump administration said the order would prevent the spread of Covid-19, specifically at border facilities, where overcrowding could have fueled transmission of the virus. Haitian migrants had been arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border for years, with a noticeable uptick following the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise in July 2021 and a major earthquake in August. Title 42 was also used to expel asylum-seekers from Mexico, Brazil and other countries. At the time, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Majorkas said he was “horrified” by the images. The notion had been around in varying forms since 1893 until finally being codified.
Moderate Sen. Joe Manchin has joined a growing chorus of Democrats calling on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to keep the Trump-era ...
“And so we are doing a lot of work to plan for that contingency.” Until the administration does that type of consultation with local government leaders and nonprofits along the border, it is premature to consider changes to Title 42 authorities.” This preemptive repeal threatens border security at a time when the administration should be focused on strengthening it.” And some U.S. intelligence estimates reportedly indicate that an influx of more than 170,000 migrants could materialize if the public health authority is lifted,” the letter continues. “Different sectors and border communities will require different resources, so the plan must be developed in consultation with local government leaders and community organizations, including those providing services to migrants,” Sinema and Kelly added. “These challenges are compounded by the recent surge in migration occurring along our southern border.
In March 2020, during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, then-President Donald Trump dusted off a decades-old public health law known as Title 42 to ...
Critics of the policy have repeatedly said its use is a misapplication of the law and is spurred by immigration concerns, not public-health worries. Officials from DHS said the administration is preparing by building new holding facilities, deploying more border agents and acquiring additional means of transportation. Trump’s public health order allowed for the rapid expulsion of nearly anyone trying to cross into the U.S. from Mexico or Canada, before they had the opportunity to seek asylum in the U.S. The Trump administration said the order would prevent the spread of Covid-19, specifically at border facilities, where overcrowding could have fueled transmission of the virus. Haitian migrants had been arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border for years, with a noticeable uptick following the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise in July 2021 and a major earthquake in August. Title 42 was also used to expel asylum-seekers from Mexico, Brazil and other countries. At the time, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Majorkas said he was “horrified” by the images. The notion had been around in varying forms since 1893 until finally being codified.