Ginni Thomas' husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has weighed in on several cases held over from the 2020 election.
We may share information about your use of our site with our advertising, social and analytics providers. We use cookies to personalize content and ads, provide social media features, improve our site and analyze our traffic. Ginni Thomas' revelation she went to Jan. 6 rally puts squishy Supreme Court rules in spotlightGinni Thomas' husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has weighed in on several cases held over from the 2020 election.
Ginni” Thomas played an active role in the fascist conspiracy headed by Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
“That Ginni was involved made sense,” he said, adding that “she’s pretty neutral and she doesn’t have a lot of enemies in the movement.” Such public and partisan political activity on the part of a spouse, let alone activity in pursuit of goals antithetical to the US Constitution, is a gross violation of judicial ethics and arguably illegal. In one post reported by Slate, Thomas linked to a news article about the ongoing attack, and wrote, “LOVE MAGA people!!!” Justice Thomas was the lone dissenter in the 8–1 decision. “Clarence doesn’t discuss his work with me, and I don’t involve him in my work,” she said. The group, the Times wrote, “holds a weekly meeting of influential conservatives, many of whom work directly on issues that come before the court.” In a recently unearthed interview from January 6, Hitler-admirer Madison Cawthorn, a Republican congressman from North Carolina, called into the Charlie Kirk show during the attack and admitted to being “armed.” As recently as 2019, Thomas described herself as the chairman of the invitation-only network of hard-right conservatives and fascists. In the interview, Thomas did not clarify where she went after leaving the rally. Thomas’s admission follows recent reporting detailing her prominent role in far-right Republican activities, including the plot, in part via the Supreme Court, to block the certification of Biden and maintain Trump in power. Virginia has used her relationship with Clarence, whom she married in 1987, four years before his accession to the Supreme Court, to advance their shared extreme right-wing political agenda. In 1968, Virginia’s mother, Marjorie Lamp, was a Republican National Committee delegate for Ronald Reagan. Eight years later, Virginia volunteered for the 1976 Reagan campaign.
Ginni Thomas said she "played no role" in organizing the January 6 rally and left before Trump made his speech.
Thomas said she was in the crowd at the Ellipse on the morning of January 6 but left before then President Donald Trump spoke. In her interview, Ginni Thomas said she "played no role with those who were planning and leading the January 6 events" and refuted reports of her involvement in the planning. That creates a clear appearance of bias and a possible major conflict of interest." Thomas told The Washington Free Beacon in an interview published on Monday that she attended the rally near the White House but "played no role" in planning the event. "Like so many married couples, we share many of the same ideals, principles, and aspirations for America," she said. "Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone vote to block the House Select Committee from getting January 6th documents from Donald Trump," Bookbinder wrote.
After the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack subpoenaed White House materials, Donald Trump sued to keep the documents from his ...
What this fails to note, however, is that Pillard recuses herself from ACLU cases. Ginni Thomas has traditionally defended her unusual familial circumstances by noting that DC Circuit Court Judge Nina Pillard is married to the ACLU’s national legal director. Thomas claims, however, that she got cold, left early, and did not hear the then-president’s speech. In case this isn’t obvious, Ginni Thomas is not just some random person with conservative political beliefs. Ginni Thomas’ efforts on Jan. 6 have been the subject of quite a bit of scrutiny lately. After the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack subpoenaed White House materials, Donald Trump sued to keep the documents from his administration hidden.
The Supreme Court justice recently hinted that Section 230 could soon be in the highest court's crosshairs.
From significant overhauls to carve-outs to more narrow reforms on the right, to targeted exceptions to immunity on the left, Congress is poised to address the evolution of its ‘90s era legislation and clear up the scope of the law. (Facebook’s initial justification for the suspension of former President Donald Trump’s account was that his posts contribute to “the risk of ongoing violence.”) Other noxious “acts and omissions” by these companies include marketing themselves as democratizers of information while enforcing a two-tiered justice system that punishes and excludes a certain set of thinkers. For it is difficult to see why the law “should protect Facebook from liability for its own ‘acts and omissions.’” The platforms should incur blame—and attendant consequences—for their actions. Facebook itself concluded that a correlation between Instagram and teen suicidal ideation (among other teen mental health issues) exists, but still believes building an Instagram platform for children under 13 is “the right thing to do.” Without the deterrent effect of private lawsuits, it is likely tech companies are more emboldened to target younger audiences, opening them to a litany of abuses.
Ginni Thomas admitted to being at the Jan. 6 rally before then-President Donald Trump addressed the crowd, and condemned the 'violence' that followed.
If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.Turn off use of cookies for targeted advertising on this website. she wrote, according to the Post. "GOD BLESS EACH OF YOU STANDING UP or PRAYING," she reportedly wrote before the throng of supporters descended into mob violence at the Capitol. (Spokespeople for the Supreme Court did not respond to a request for comment at the time.) These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. - Russian forces are approaching Kyiv from the north and northeast, Ukraine's army said, with rising fears the capital could fall on the second day of Moscow's offensive. Justice Clarence Thomas' Wife Was at Jan. 6 Trump Rally but Says She 'Played No Role' in Riots "I was disappointed and frustrated that there was violence that happened following a peaceful gathering of Trump supporters," Virginia "Ginni" Thomas said Virginia "Ginni" Thomas — the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas — is speaking out about being present at the Jan. 6 rally in Washington, D. C., which preceded the insurrection at the Capitol. In a new interview with The Washington Free Beacon, Ginni, 65, said she attended the rally on the morning of Jan. 6, but left before then-President Donald Trump addressed the crowd. "My passions and beliefs are likely shared with the bulk of you, but certainly not all," she wrote last year, according to The Washington Post and The New York Times. "And sometimes the smallest matters can divide loved ones for too long. When the button is red, the targeting cookies we have identified have been turned off. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work. "I was disappointed and frustrated that there was violence that happened following a peaceful gathering of Trump supporters on the Ellipse on Jan. 6," she said. I did not," she told the Free Beacon. Ginni also said of herself and her husband, 73, "Like so many married couples, we share many of the same ideals, principles, and aspirations for America." "But we have our own separate careers, and our own ideas and opinions too. RELATED: Fox News' Laura Ingraham Feared Violence After Jan. 6, Text Shows: "Calm Down and Pray for Our Country" Ginni's comments come amid reports from outlets like The New York Times and The New Yorker that question her links to and involvement in the rally and subsequent riots at the Capitol. "There are stories in the press suggesting I paid or arranged for buses.
WASHINGTON -- Conservative activist Virginia "Ginni" Thomas said in an interview published Monday that although she attended a rally on January 6, 2021, ...
You can use the opt out toggle above to opt out of the “sale” of your personal information, as defined by the CCPA, of certain advertising on this site. You or your authorized agent may also have other choices and tools that allow you to control certain data collection activities. You or your authorized agent can change your opt out selection anytime by clicking the “Do Not Sell My Personal Information” link on this site. To learn more, visit Do Not Sell My Personal Information Rights. Do Not Sell My Personal InformationThe California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) permits California residents, or their authorized agents, to opt out of the “sale” of their personal information to third parties. Cheney and Kinzinger are serving at the request of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. If you choose to opt out of “sale” of your personal information, you may continue to see advertising, such as ads by us or our partners that are tailored to you and your interests, including, for example, ads that do not involve the “sale” of personal information or ads based on personal information that was “sold” before you opted out. She said that she attended a rally but returned home before former President Donald Trump took the stage at noon. Your CCPA opt out right must be exercised on each website of the Walt Disney Family of Companies you access. Please note that even if this category is set as inactive, we may continue to collect and use data through these cookies solely to assist us in performing the service.When you visit this website, we and our partners may collect certain information about you, your devices, and your behaviour, and “sell” this information to third parties to provide you with certain advertising on this site and across the web tailored to you and your interests. I did not." She also clarified her actions on January 6.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas talks to his wife, Ginni Thomas, a conservative activist, at the Heritage Foundation on Oct. 21, 2021, in Washington, D.C..
The harm, adds Gillers, is to the court itself, and it reputation. In furtherance of that statute, Supreme Court justices and their spouses are required to file annual financial disclosure forms. In an interview with the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, she says, that while the couple "share many of the same ideals, principles and aspirations for America...we have our own separate careers, and out own ideas and opinions too." Those range from her activities on behalf of Trump to her speeches condemning the Affordable Care Act. In January, for instance, the Supreme Court rejected Trump's effort to block a congressional subpoena for White House records related to the events surrounding the certification of the 2020 presidential election, and the Jan. 6 riot. Critics have maintained that Justice Thomas should recuse himself from participating in cases that touch on issues his wife has publicly spoken about, even campaigned about.