Russia's capture of the Chernobyl nuclear plant raised alarms across the international community, with many world leaders wondering if Russia chose to seize ...
You may click on “Your Choices” below to learn about and use cookie management tools to limit use of cookies when you visit NPR’s sites. If you click “Agree and Continue” below, you acknowledge that your cookie choices in those tools will be respected and that you otherwise agree to the use of cookies on NPR’s sites. NPR’s sites use cookies, similar tracking and storage technologies, and information about the device you use to access our sites (together, “cookies”) to enhance your viewing, listening and user experience, personalize content, personalize messages from NPR’s sponsors, provide social media features, and analyze NPR’s traffic.
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has sent troops through Chernobyl, the site of the world's worst nuclear power plant accident, raising questions about the ...
The chemical structure of strontium-90 allows it to replace calcium and become assimilated in teeth and bones, exposing the body to radiation over a longer period with its half-life of 29 years. Cesium-137, with a half-life of 30 years, is one of the most common byproducts of fission; is highly radioactive, chemically reactive, and soluble; and is light enough that it spread the farthest of all the contamination. In the weeks following the accident, workers enclosed the reactor building—which still contains highly radioactive fuel material—in a concrete and steel structure called “the sarcophagus.” That eventually began to deteriorate. The Ukraine government said radiation monitors in the area showed a spike in radiation levels after the Chernobyl attack. On April 26 of that year, operators running a test lost control of the Number Four reactor, causing a fire that destroyed the building. Early on Thursday, Feb. 24, the first day of their invasion, Russian troops occupied Chernobyl, the site of a 1986 explosion that spewed radioactive material into the surrounding area.
The Kremlin may not consider the nuclear power plant itself a military asset, but the site of the 1986 disaster is strategically located between Belarus and ...
The disaster has been a subject of historical revisionism in the decades since then as Putin and his allies try to recast the Soviet Union in a more positive light. "They want to surround the capital." “It’s a useless piece of real estate,” said a congressional aide who has been briefed by U.S. officials. “The location is important because of where it sits,” retired Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, former commanding general of U.S. Army Europe, said in an interview. Few places conjure more foreboding than Chernobyl, the site of the deadly 1986 nuclear disaster. "They certainly don’t want loose nuclear material floating around," she said.
Radiation levels spiked near the site of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster after Russia seized control of the area in its invasion of Ukraine, authorities said ...
The site is roughly 10 miles from Ukraine’s border with Russia and 80 miles north of Ukraine capital city Kyiv. Russian forces confirmed they had taken control of the plant on Thursday but said in a statement Friday that said radiation levels “are normal” in the area, according to Interfax. The control levels of gamma radiation in the exclusion zone surrounding Chernobyl’s nuclear power plant “were exceeded,” the State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine said in a statement.
Russian forces have seized control of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, an adviser to the Ukrainian presidential office said Thursday, according to Reuters ...
- In addition, munitions — gunfire, artillery shells, missiles, hitting the facility itself could release radioactivity and threaten citizens of nearby EU countries. - "Our defenders are giving their lives so that the tragedy of 1986 will not be repeated. We condemn it and we request their release." - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine in atweet also warnedthat a Russian attack on Ukraine "may cause another ecological disaster." ... This is a declaration of war against the whole of Europe," Zelenskywrote in a tweet. The latest: The U.S. is "outraged by credible reports that Russian soldiers are currently holding the staff of the Chernobyl facilities hostage," White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said at a press briefing Thursday evening.
The failed Chernobyl nuclear power plant in northern Ukraine as well as the nation's 15 operating reactors are safe and secure amid Russia's invasion, ...
The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant — the largest of Ukraine’s atomic plants — houses six separate reactors. Rafael Mariano Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, based in Vienna, said in a statement on Thursday that its Ukrainian counterpart reported that the nation’s 15 nuclear power plants were operating safely. If a plant lost its external supply of electrical power, Mr. Kotin added, backup generators would kick in to ensure uninterrupted reactor control. Two of Ukraine’s four operational nuclear sites are in its western region — far from Russia’s main invasion routes and presumably out of harm’s way. An exclusion zone for hundreds of square miles surrounds the abandoned plant to limit public access and inhabitation. All four Chernobyl reactors are still shut down, and the plant’s work force closely monitors the safety of Chernobyl’s Unit 4 reactor, which in 1986 exploded and caught fire.
The next Chernobyl scale nuclear disaster could happen in Chernobyl as the Ukraine conflict intensifies.
For example the planned Hanhikivi reactor in Finland is unlikely to proceed and the plan for two Russian reactors in Hungary might also be abandoned. Yet another problem is that the risk of nuclear smuggling could worsen. For the time being, it is highly unlikely there will be any regulation whatsoever of the country's ageing reactors and other nuclear facilities. It doesn't help that NATO and Russian military doctrines allow for the use of tactical nuclear weapons to fend off defeat in a major conventional war. Thus the IAEA has been unable to conclude that all civil nuclear materials and facilities in Ukraine have remained in peaceful use. In 1983, a Soviet satellite mistakenly signalled the launch of a US missile. Perhaps the greatest risk is that one or another nuclear-armed nation will mistakenly believe itself to be under nuclear attack and respond in kind. Nuclear facilities have repeatedly been targets of cyber-attack, including the Stuxnet computer virus targeted by Israel and the US to disrupt Iran's uranium enrichment centrifuges in 2009. The risk of an inadvertent attack on reactors or nuclear waste stores is somewhat higher than a deliberate attack. Where the truth lies, nobody knows: it is lost in the fog of the low-level warfare that has played out since 2014. The current conflict between Russia and Ukraine provides a test-case of the above war-gaming. But assuming there is a 'gentleman's agreement' not to target nuclear power plants, how long would that agreement hold in a war that dragged on for years?
Russian forces seized control of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. While some offer measured responses concerning the potential for human and ecological ...
“I want the world to know that we are one little step—a few millimeters—from destroying our world.” Yet this morning, the State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine reported that radiation levels in the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone were “exceeded at a significant number of observation points” since Russian forces assumed control. “Not so many people understand how dangerous nuclear power plants are in the case of war,” Pavlova said. But as an independent, nonprofit media organization, our operations depend on the support of readers like you. The stricken reactor has been entombed in a sarcophagus—a steel and concrete coffin-like structure—since 1986. Though the International Atomic Energy Agency, a United Nations watchdog, reported that there have been “ no casualties nor destruction” at Chernobyl, experts and the public are now at work attempting to understand the potential risks posed by the takeover. The New Safe Confinement was funded by more than 30 countries at a cost of $1.5 billion. Expert views of the potential risk have changed since the news broke. White House Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, later expressed similar concern: “This unlawful and dangerous hostage-taking, which could upend the routine civil service efforts required to maintain and protect the nuclear waste facilities, is obviously incredibly alarming. Many posit theories for why Russia sought to seize control of Chernobyl, including using the site as a base, for a potential act of terrorism, or for the symbolic “win” it may represent. The plant, along with the approximately 1,000-square miles around it known as the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, supports ongoing work focused on nuclear waste management and storage. The takeover was part of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s multi-pronged assault on Ukraine, which began on Thursday.
Russian troops pushing through the exclusion zone around the former Chernobyl nuclear plant north of Kyiv captured the plant itself, according to Mykhailo ...
Fearing that the sarcophagus might collapse and spew radioactive dust into the air — potentially repeating the widespread contamination of 1986 — more than two dozen nations financed the construction of an arch-shaped steel building that was moved into place over the sarcophagus in 2016. But over time the sarcophagus deteriorated, becoming unstable, and the aging fuel began to crumble. What remains, however, is a lot of nuclear waste, and the plant’s capture is raising concerns about nuclear safety.
Major gun battle breaks out between Russian and Ukrainian forces at stricken radioactive site with its status unclear.
Robots inside the shelter work to dismantle the destroyed reactor and gather up the radioactive waste. It’s expected to take until 2064 to finish dismantling the reactors. Soviet authorities made the catastrophe even worse by failing to tell the public what had happened, angering European governments and the Soviet people. Lyman said he is most worried about spent fuel stored at the site, which has not been active since 2000. Everyone should understand that it’s not only about Ukraine, the whole of Europe is in major danger.” The increase could not be immediately corroborated.