Gunmaker Remington has agreed to pay more than $70 million to settle a lawsuit with families of nine victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting ...
As part of the settlement, the families are also allowed to release materials related to how Remington marketed the rifle. Gunmaker Remington has agreed to pay more than $70 million to settle a lawsuit with families of nine victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting that killed 20 young children and 6 adults almost a decade ago. In 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court said it would allow the suit to go forward.
Families of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre hope the $73 million settlement will put companies that insure gun-makers on notice that they ...
Well, up until yesterday, the gun industry has essentially been untouchable and the insurance companies and the banking industries have been shielded from accountability in that way as well, through this blanket immunity they have through the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act that was signed in 2005, commonly known as PLCAA. And it just doesn't seem right, and it doesn't seem fair that you should be able to manufacture and market the most lethal consumer product we know, without any checks and balances on the way you do that. I mean, the whole point of this suit from the very beginning was to try to move the needle in the way the firearms industry operates in this country. You know, it'll be a little while before we know this concretely, but the right direction for this would be for companies that make these products, as they said, to be more responsible in the way they bring them to market. And the whole point of this, from the beginning, was to try to change how that works. The settlement still needs a judge's approval to be final. Families also fought to be able to release documents they obtained during the discovery phase of the suit that they say show Remington targeted insecure young men specifically with their gun marketing, reports Graziano.
The families of nine Sandy Hook school shooting victims settled a lawsuit for $73 million on Tuesday against the maker of the AR-15-style rifle used in the ...
“Most of the country — or at least half the country — is not looking for ways to liberalize or open the door to litigation,” he said. The lawsuit contended that hypermasculine themes — including an advertisement with a photograph of the weapon and the slogan “Consider your man card reissued” — specifically appealed to troubled young men, like the Sandy Hook gunman, who was 20. But the National Shooting Sports Foundation argued that the lawsuit was trying to achieve “regulation through litigation.” In a 4-to-3 ruling, the justices ruled that the case could move ahead based on a state law regarding unfair trade practices. “It sends a powerful message to these executives — even with your special protections, you can and will be held accountable for gun violence,” he said. When President George W. Bush signed the legislation, he praised it as a necessary safeguard to “stem frivolous lawsuits.” Gun industry representatives said the settlement would not set a pattern. The financial settlement is being paid by insurance companies that had represented Remington, which is in bankruptcy. Even in a country where mass shootings had become a painfully common occurrence, the Sandy Hook massacre was a gut-wrenching moment because so many of the victims were so young. The families argued that Remington, the gunmaker, promoted sales of the weapon that appealed to troubled men like the killer who stormed into Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., on Dec. 14, 2012, killing 20 first graders and six adults. Legal experts stressed that not only have most federal gun control efforts failed, but federal immunity for gunmakers remains a formidable barrier to litigation. “It is hard to imagine an outcome that better accomplishes that goal.”
Firearms training unit Detective Barbara Mattson, of the Connecticut State Police, holds up a Bushmaster AR-15 rifle on Jan. 28, 2013. It's the same make and ...
Now, that suit has come to a close. Two years later, relatives of victims sued the Remington Arms Co. in a Connecticut court. "For the gun industry, it's time to stop recklessly marketing all guns to all people for all uses and instead ask how marketing can lower risk rather than court it. For the insurance and banking industries, it's time to recognize the financial cost of underwriting companies that elevate profit by escalating risk. The gun-maker filed for bankruptcy in 2020, and its assets were sold off. The president also urged state and local lawmakers, lawyers and survivors of gun violence "to pursue efforts to replicate the success of the Sandy Hook families."
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) — The families of nine victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School have agreed to a $73 million settlement of a lawsuit against the maker ...
The site owner may have set restrictions that prevent you from accessing the site. The site owner may have set restrictions that prevent you from accessing the site. Contact the site owner for access or try loading the page again.
The families of five children and four adults killed in the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting have reached a $73 million settlement with the ...
The closest I get to him now is by kissing his urn every night, telling him I love him and I miss him," Hockley said. For this, we are grateful," Pozner and De La Rosa said. "But I made him a promise, and I'll keep working to deliver that promise for the rest of my life. Last summer, Remington approached the families with a nearly $33 million settlement offer Julia Ofman, a spokesperson working with the Koskoff law firm, told CNN the settlement has been filed today in bankruptcy court. A 2005 federal law protects many gun manufacturers from wrongful death lawsuits brought by family members -- but the marketing argument was a new approach.